I agree. I have distorted-sounding audio, too. Grant ----- Original Message ----- From: "Neal Ewers" <ewers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 6:48 AM Subject: [bookport] Re: Relative volume between text and mp3 > Larry, when I received my new book port, I put some MP3 files on the > unit and played them back. I noticed that they sounded distorted even > when using good powered speakers and with the volume of the book port > considerably low. The files were normalized to 0 on Sound Forge and > there was no clipping of the sound. The bottom line is that when I > try to play an MP3 file that is close to 0 db, it sounds distorted on > the book port. Even some of the books I have downloaded from Audible > such as Bill Clinton's book, sounds distorted. That could simply be > the quality of the book. However, the files I am talking about are > ones I created which are well within the non-distorted range of audio > and still play back as a bit distorted on the book port. So, I'm > wondering if this suggests a slight lowering of the audio level > relative to the synthesized speech? > > Just my observations. > Neal > > > -----Original Message----- > From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of LARRY SKUTCHAN > Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 7:05 AM > To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [bookport] Re: Relative volume between text and mp3 > > > We did make an increase, but it isn't enough. We are already using > full volume on the tts, so to change the relative volume, we will have > to cut down on the audio, and I don't think we want to do that. > > >>>> richard@xxxxxxxxxxxx Tuesday, March 29, 2005 4:47:01 PM >>> > Hi Larry, > In this latest firmware, the revision history says: > "Increases the relative volume of the text-to-speech when playing an > audio=20 > file." > I just tried an mp3 file as part of testing the battery drain and the > Book=20 > Port voice could hardly be heard over the mp3 file. > Is that a feature not yet implemented? > > Thanks, > Richard > > >