This is not exactly correct. APH does their own firmware and transfer software, so they are not dependent on Springer Design for that. Moreover, the arrangement between APH and Springer _must_ be cooperative, since I'm quite sure that APH sells more of these units as the Book Port than Springer does as the BookCourier. You're correct in that Springer actually manufactures the unit, but I'm certain that they don't maintain an absolute veto over hardware design and requirements. And as someone else has already pointed out, NLS is concerned (rightly, in my opinion) with pirating and security. I don't know how many NLS books I've seen on Internet news groups that deal with audio books and these were clearly copied from their cassettes. Nothing is going to stop all pirating--anyone with a patch cord and a recorder is always going to be able to capture the audio output of a Talking Book and do whatever they want with it--but it's NLS's legal and moral responsibility to make it as difficult as possible. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill" <052338@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2006 6:13 AM Subject: [bookport] Re: NLS Beta Program As we all know, it is springer designs that designed, modify and manufacture the bookport. It is up to them to make any hardware, firmware or software changes and no doubt they can make any changes to the unit that will meet our needs. APH can certainly have some influence on springer designs, and have doubtless done so in the past. But, they cannot dictabe what changes are to be made. The real "culprit" here, I think, is NLS. Why would they come out with a format for their book download program or for their new digital player that is not currently widely used such as mp3? Is it because they must be different or are they just not living in the real world. Much money wasted here I think. Give APH credit when credit is due. I think they've done a great job. BILL