APH never gave the slightest hint that they were even contemplating
changing this aspect of things. He wanted a thinner design, and this
thinness, he said, would preclude the use of regular batteries. And
there's also the battery terminals issue, which seems to ahve been a
major one for APH.
bruce
--
Bruce Toews
Skype ID: o.canada
E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: DogRiver@xxxxxxxx
LiveJournal: http://brucetola.livejournal.com
Radio Show and Podcast: http://www.totw.net
Web Site (including info on my weekly commentaries): http://www.ogts.net
Info on the Best TV Show of All Time: http://www.cornergas.com
On Sat, 14 Jul 2007, Walt Smith wrote:
Yes, we had this discussion at considerable length back when ideas for a new
Book Port were being kicked around here. I agree with you, so I remain still
at least slightly hopeful that this may be changed as the new version moves
through the design phase.
-----Original Message-----
From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Ann byrne
Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2007 11:02 AM
To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bookport] Re: Batteries current vs. future Book Port
Boy, what a shame! One of the things I like best about the current
BookPort is that I can go on vacation without the ability to recharge
it, and just pop in new AA's when I need them.
