Amen , Brother Ben. Shot at a goose and killed a hen. Such is the tale of
Brother Ben. Anonymous
Richard
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 20, 2019, at 8:54 AM, Carl Jarvis <carjar82@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
What I hear, as I read Mostafa's rants, could be the drooling from the
mouth of Donald Trump, defending his own irrational beliefs. What a
shameful tirade from the self proclaimed Peace Maker.
Mostafa, listen carefully to Donald Trump, and you will see a mirror
image of yourself. While wild attacks are one method of distracting
attention from the issue at hand, it usually comes back like a
boomerang, to bite you in the ass.
Again, all of your study, all of your training, all of your wanting it
to be true, cannot prove the existence of Allah/God. Be content to
believe what you wish to believe, but please accept that other people
do not choose to share in your Fairy Tale.
Carl Jarvis, still a Faithful Agnostic
On 7/20/19, Bob Hachey <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Mostafa,
I really do wish that you would allow American style free speech from Roger
the way I allow it for you on the ACB-Chat list. You are probably aware that
a few ACB-Chat members want me as moderator to ban you from the list. Unless
you break our rules, you can be assured that I will not comply with that
request.
Yet, you seem to want to shut Roger down on the topic of religion here on
this list.
Therefore, I ask the following: Do you respect and agree with aMerican style
freedom of speech? That means defending the rights of someone to shout at
the top of his or her lungs that which you would spend a life time
opposing.
Respectfully,
Bob Hachey
-----Original Message-----
From: blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mostafa
Sent: Saturday, July 20, 2019 12:44 AM
To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [blind-democracy] Re: The practice of lobbyism and its influence on
US legislation
Roger insists to shamelessly appear idiotic and rather kafkaesque. I'm here
at it again, intemperately lambasting his quite susceptible outbound. He
couldn't compete toe-to-toe. He's gone down to the sewer I am afraid. I
wasn't addressing your damnable disposal in the first place. What has
brought you to interpose? I actually don't fathom, what has your despicable
despise of faith got to do with the subject I
proposed? Whenever I talk, he unwelcomely intervenes with quite
negative and detestable salacity. Roger hasn't proved his allegedly
biological credentials. It theoretically exists in his miserably bungling
mind, just like the evolution's mythical notion. Despite your obstinance and
abnegation, Islam is incomparably the fastest growing faith across the
globe. In spite of the fact that you haven't clicked on the video that
features Koran scientifically pertained citations out of fright, it is
prominently ratified. I'd like to know though, what is Roger's significance
in this world? What has this hellion's pathetic life brought to the good of
human development? He brought
nothing but derision, left-wing fanaticism and bigotry. What has
the unpleasant experience of the grandson of Ku Klux Klan pro activist got
to do with proper theological vocation? Islam brought me confidence and
composure. Roger claims that he attempted to dispose me, but it somewhat
seems that my messages are just too much for him.
I was talking to someone else, what has made you interpose your nose?
Roger truly demands to be disciplined with corporal punishment. If you were
presented to me, I would have unhesitatingly suspended you and beaten your
damnably bare soles with a cudgel, bastinado. I would have truly enjoyed you
weeping in absolute agony through this tremendously unenviable situation. I
wish to see you just for once somewhat respectful of yourself. It seems you
enjoy being mortified and having your pride maimed. If you don't like
religion, you may better quit reacting to any of my posts for the sake of
your alleged dignity. I won't ever stop posting about my beliefs and
convictions to either this list or any other forum across the web. My
condemnation of Atheism is primarily based on decisive evidence for its
demonstratively fallacious origin. If I became Atheist tomorrow, would the
world then be a better place? Atheism is just a form of mental
disaffirmation to the unarguable fact that the divine force exists.
There are no empirical or philosophical evidence for the denial of God. It's
just something they sternly resent. As for evolution, it's basically
pseudoscientific and absolutely mythological. I would like to assist Roger
to identify some of his relative chimpanzees. One of them occupies the White
House though. Wait, that was quite a heavy joke, my apology to chimps. So
Roger, next time, when I address someone else, keep your imprecated mouth
shut for the sake of your dishonourable pride. Before I toss the dice back,
beware of crossing your boundaries once again. Faith is a subject of your
obvious uninterestedness and it's a borderline for me. So, try to be factual
and don't miss the fact that I won't ever defer to your arrogance nor I'll
tolerate your ignorance. Deriding theological major is totally unacceptable
for me. I hope you understood, though I really doubt. I have more to offer
you if you're interested. I could always be tougher along the way unless
someone submissively recedes.
On 7/19/19, Roger Loran Bailey <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I really have been trying to ignore Mostafa, but then he comes along
with something like this that I can't resist. Mostafa wrote: "In
primal missionary activism, Muslims who haven't received proper
theological vocation are directly targeted with misconceptions about
their own faith. Ordinarily, they are not sufficiently adequate to
sagely refute them."
Oh yes, this reminds me of the certified theologian who was not
adequate at refuting an argument that destroyed his main justification
for religion, so he threw a tantrum instead.
---
Voltaire
??? Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit
atrocities. ???
??? Voltaire,
On 7/18/2019 9:19 PM, Mostafa Almahdy wrote:
Hello sir, thank you so much for your response. Well, to answer your
question concisely, people with mental disability here are
unfortunately pretermitted. As for how legislation is passed, it's
essentially enforced by governmental authority. Guns here are only
obtained by officers who work for either the military forces or the
police service. Blind people here mostly work for call centres et
cetera. Now, I would like to know something regarding the nature of
missionary activism in northern Africa and Muslim nations in
particular. In primal missionary activism, Muslims who haven't
received proper theological vocation are directly targeted with
misconceptions about their own faith. Ordinarily, they are not
sufficiently adequate to sagely refute them. They thence might be
trapped into fallacious premisses. Moreover, many missionary
activists may target Muslims who have been ruthlessly displaced in
tough refugee camps. They may provide them with food, money and
shelter in exchange for their belief. This is conspicuously
notorious. In addition, Muslims who live in the States aren't so
knowledgeable about theological concerns. Consequently, they aren't
of equatable compeer to the southern evangelist out there. Why would
enthusiastic gospellers seek refuge with this not so favourable
manner of preaching? I would've much prefered, if the pastor
recognised and fairly distinguished between theologically certified
and incompetent Muslims. Islam is strong and able to converse with
those who plainly dissent with it. Christian missionary and Atheists
alike explicitly target immigrants from Syrian origin. I have stats
brought to me by a reliable research centre on that regard, based in
Toronto. The missional sentiment focuses on Muslims who are not so
educated theologically. I never attempted to enter into religious
debate with average Christians, because I knew it isn't quite ethical to
do so.
I'd like you to perhaps pass on this message on my behalf to majorly
zealous preachers who often travel overseas to purposely proselytise
to Muslims. I hope you do not hasten to somewhat manipulate and
dominate average and not so edified Muslims. Lebanese, Jordanian,
Syrian or Egyptian of your neighborhood, neither of them is
theologically qualified. If you are critical about reaching up to
those who of equal playing field, you need to meet up with
theologians, imams, teachers and so forth. I contacted various
Christian broadcasts and asked them to host me in their shows. They
basically neglected my message which wasn't so respectful. I contact
them, because I hear them talk quite noxiously about major Islamic
tenets and figures, yet, I have full ability to respond appropriately.
So, I didn't contact them to argue with them about their own faith. I
approached them to simply fend for mine which was quite reasonable
and consistent. Some of these shows were broadcasted in Arabic and
their anchors would have spoken so lewdly and presumptuously about
Islam, mocked its prophet and defamed the Koran. That is not
acceptable for me. I'd like to direct the subsequent proposition to
all Americans who receive this follow up thread. You must sternly
quit scolding Jihad for 9-11. You must in fact quit blaming all of us
for that. We're not held accountable of the scandalous security
breach committed on that day. I do not deny the presence of extremism
in some religious elements that belong to Islam, but you have
overinflated this incident for quite awhile. I'd like to unfeignedly
advise mission staff and their affiliates to quit seeking Muslims of
low financial and educational status and rather meet up with settled
and theologically elucidated individuals. I invite those who are keen
to present the Gospel creed to openly evangelise to me. If you cope
with that demand, your preaching mission would have been more
credible. It isn't so ethical in any manner, to intently hunt those
of financial privation or spiritual vanity. We hope to see this
unfavourable portrait significantly enhance. I never coveted to
settle in the States in exchange for my identity. I hope this is fathomed
thoroughly.
On 7/18/19, Nathaniel Kile <heavens4real@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello dear friend,
Can you explain how this is all carried out in your own land? Can
you clarify any misconceptions that we may have about where you
dwell? Thank you for explaining what happens here in the US, in the
land where many of us have lived from birth. What approach has your
upstanding government taken to avoid our pit-falls here in the US?
How is life for the blind, disabled and those suffering from mental
health concerns. What exactly are your gun laws and how are laws
passed and legislation carried out?
Please, feel free to be as detailed as possible. My only sources
come from our personal conversations and missionaries who I have
known who have lived there.
Nate Kile, Associate Director of Instructional Services, Technology
Specialist, TechVision Virtual based technology instruction for
blind/low vision students and TVI???s
907-444-3707
Website with hundreds of informational articles & lessons on using
talking software/screen reader programs on Windows computers, Office
products, iPad/iTools and more, all done with keystrokes:
www.yourtechvision.com
ate Kile,Associate Director of Instructional Services, Technology
Specialist, TechVision Virtual based technology instruction for
blind/low vision students and TVI???s
907-444-3707
Website with hundreds of informational articles & lessons on using
talking software/screen reader programs on Windows computers, Office
products, iPad/iTools and more, all done with keystrokes:
www.yourtechvision.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Mostafa Almahdy <mostafa.almahdy@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2019 7:55 AM
To: undisclosed-recipients:
Subject: The practice of lobbyism and its influence on US
legislation
What makes the United States allegedly so reputable? It is the
averred claim that legal authority is incomparably the highest
entity in the whole nation. Consequently, justice is assuredly
implemented. Well, today I decided to reveal the truth on that
regard. How is law enforcement applied in the States? Before we get
into that, let us first define the work of lobbyism in America's
political arena.
Lobbyism is the Attempt to influence public officials and executives
in favor of specific sentiment or notion. Impounded to that, there
are expenses incurred in promoting or scoping legislation. So for
instance, the gun lobby is so powerful and immensely influential
into congressional platform. It's called NRA. It's the most
powerful lobby that advocates the right to own and bear arms in the
States. It furthermore promotes unrestricted firearm possession and
rejects any gun regulation by the government. Despite perennial
occurrence of mass shootings because of unrestricted firearms
possession including repeaters, NRA importunes to boost for
unstructured firearms possession. How do they tempt congressional
authority? Factually, they either bribe or intimidate legislature to
deter its members of proceeding to pass any bill that aims to
regulate firearms possession.
They call attempts to regulate firearms possession hyperbole. Many
people here in the Middle East incorrectly assume that law
enforcement in the States is unambiguously unswayed. Now, they knew
this is incredibly counterfeit and gravely delusional. Similarly,
the rule is typically applied regarding America's categorical aid to
Israel. There are plenty of Jewish lobbies in the States to
advocate, elevate and boost for Zionist favouritism in Capitol Hill.
Lobbies in American politics are so crucial and mutually
influential. Again, a lobby is basically a bond group of people who
try actively to influence legislative arena. The hate sentiment
against Islam in the States is necessarily impacted with the power
of lobbyism. So, law in the States isn't independent. It's
constantly influenced and manipulated by proactive lobbyists. So,
American legislation is attributable to be illimitably rectified,
regurgitated, modified and inevitably aligned with the highest
amount that is to be paid. Republicans are sponsored by certain
lobbies and so Democrats. Thence, neither party is politically
autonomous.
Each one of them is possessed, financed and wholly controlled by
external bodies. So, opinion is essentially promoted based on how
much is paid.
Is
this an honourable system?
Leastwise, it is the worst legislative model that has ever
maneuvered on earth. Needless to say, each and every lobby of these
as for the gun and Israel one has its own media to broadly promote its
notion.
Muslims in the States are misrepresented because they're often
talked about by others who're not impartial. To the contrary, at any
rate, they're prejudiced about them. If Muslims had enough money to
pay those lobbyists, they would have displaced their major rivals.
Truly, the situation is inextricable. So, it's nothing about stiff
principles or invariant convictions. It's all about, how much is
someone willing to pay? The higher you pay, the closer I'm going to
be leaned toward your side. So, ladies and gentlemen, this is how
things work. It is indeed, the filthiest system I ever encountered.
In actuality, this is how Trump was brought to oval office and this
is how's he being protected despite his irreconcilably punishable
offences. Well, I'm done.
--
(Seeking knowledge is compulsory from cratle to grave because it is
a shoreless ocean.)
