Hello sir, thank you so much for your response. Well, to answer your
question concisely, people with mental disability here are
unfortunately pretermitted. As for how legislation is passed, it's
essentially enforced by governmental authority. Guns here are only
obtained by officers who work for either the military forces or the
police service. Blind people here mostly work for call centres et
cetera. Now, I would like to know something regarding the nature of
missionary activism in northern Africa and Muslim nations in
particular. In primal missionary activism, Muslims who haven't
received proper theological vocation are directly targeted with
misconceptions about their own faith. Ordinarily, they are not
sufficiently adequate to sagely refute them. They thence might be
trapped into fallacious premisses. Moreover, many missionary activists
may target Muslims who have been ruthlessly displaced in tough refugee
camps. They may provide them with food, money and shelter in exchange
for their belief. This is conspicuously notorious. In addition,
Muslims who live in the States aren't so knowledgeable about
theological concerns. Consequently, they aren't of equatable compeer
to the southern evangelist out there. Why would enthusiastic
gospellers seek refuge with this not so favourable manner of
preaching? I would've much prefered, if the pastor recognised and
fairly distinguished between theologically certified and incompetent
Muslims. Islam is strong and able to converse with those who plainly
dissent with it. Christian missionary and Atheists alike explicitly
target immigrants from Syrian origin. I have stats brought to me by a
reliable research centre on that regard, based in Toronto. The
missional sentiment focuses on Muslims who are not so educated
theologically. I never attempted to enter into religious debate with
average Christians, because I knew it isn't quite ethical to do so.
I'd like you to perhaps pass on this message on my behalf to majorly
zealous preachers who often travel overseas to purposely proselytise
to Muslims. I hope you do not hasten to somewhat manipulate and
dominate average and not so edified Muslims. Lebanese, Jordanian,
Syrian or Egyptian of your neighborhood, neither of them is
theologically qualified. If you are critical about reaching up to
those who of equal playing field, you need to meet up with
theologians, imams, teachers and so forth. I contacted various
Christian broadcasts and asked them to host me in their shows. They
basically neglected my message which wasn't so respectful. I contact
them, because I hear them talk quite noxiously about major Islamic
tenets and figures, yet, I have full ability to respond appropriately.
So, I didn't contact them to argue with them about their own faith. I
approached them to simply fend for mine which was quite reasonable and
consistent. Some of these shows were broadcasted in Arabic and their
anchors would have spoken so lewdly and presumptuously about Islam,
mocked its prophet and defamed the Koran. That is not acceptable for
me. I'd like to direct the subsequent proposition to all Americans who
receive this follow up thread. You must sternly quit scolding Jihad
for 9-11. You must in fact quit blaming all of us for that. We're not
held accountable of the scandalous security breach committed on that
day. I do not deny the presence of extremism in some religious
elements that belong to Islam, but you have overinflated this incident
for quite awhile. I'd like to unfeignedly advise mission staff and
their affiliates to quit seeking Muslims of low financial and
educational status and rather meet up with settled and theologically
elucidated individuals. I invite those who are keen to present the
Gospel creed to openly evangelise to me. If you cope with that demand,
your preaching mission would have been more credible. It isn't so
ethical in any manner, to intently hunt those of financial privation
or spiritual vanity. We hope to see this unfavourable portrait
significantly enhance. I never coveted to settle in the States in
exchange for my identity. I hope this is fathomed thoroughly.
On 7/18/19, Nathaniel Kile <heavens4real@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello dear friend,
Can you explain how this is all carried out in your own land? Can you
clarify any misconceptions that we may have about where you dwell? Thank you
for explaining what happens here in the US, in the land where many of us
have lived from birth. What approach has your upstanding government taken to
avoid our pit-falls here in the US? How is life for the blind, disabled and
those suffering from mental health concerns. What exactly are your gun laws
and how are laws passed and legislation carried out?
Please, feel free to be as detailed as possible. My only sources come from
our personal conversations and missionaries who I have known who have lived
there.
Nate Kile, Associate Director of Instructional Services, Technology
Specialist, TechVision
Virtual based technology instruction for blind/low vision students and
TVI’s
907-444-3707
Website with hundreds of informational articles & lessons on using talking
software/screen reader programs on Windows computers, Office products,
iPad/iTools and more, all done with keystrokes: www.yourtechvision.com
ate Kile,Associate Director of Instructional Services, Technology
Specialist, TechVision
Virtual based technology instruction for blind/low vision students and
TVI’s
907-444-3707
Website with hundreds of informational articles & lessons on using talking
software/screen reader programs on Windows computers, Office products,
iPad/iTools and more, all done with keystrokes: www.yourtechvision.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Mostafa Almahdy <mostafa.almahdy@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2019 7:55 AM
To: undisclosed-recipients:
Subject: The practice of lobbyism and its influence on US legislation
What makes the United States allegedly so reputable? It is the averred
claim that legal authority is incomparably the highest entity in the whole
nation. Consequently, justice is assuredly implemented. Well, today I
decided to reveal the truth on that regard. How is law enforcement applied
in the States? Before we get into that, let us first define the work of
lobbyism in America's political arena.
Lobbyism is the Attempt to influence public officials and executives in
favor of specific sentiment or notion. Impounded to that, there are
expenses incurred in promoting or scoping legislation. So for instance, the
gun lobby is so powerful and immensely influential into congressional
platform. It's called NRA. It's the most powerful lobby that advocates the
right to own and bear arms in the States. It furthermore promotes
unrestricted firearm possession and rejects any gun regulation by the
government. Despite perennial occurrence of mass shootings because of
unrestricted firearms possession including repeaters, NRA importunes to
boost for unstructured firearms possession. How do they tempt congressional
authority? Factually, they either bribe or intimidate legislature to deter
its members of proceeding to pass any bill that aims to regulate firearms
possession.
They call attempts to regulate firearms possession hyperbole. Many people
here in the Middle East incorrectly assume that law enforcement in the
States is unambiguously unswayed. Now, they knew this is incredibly
counterfeit and gravely delusional. Similarly, the rule is typically applied
regarding America's categorical aid to Israel. There are plenty of Jewish
lobbies in the States to advocate, elevate and boost for Zionist favouritism
in Capitol Hill. Lobbies in American politics are so crucial and mutually
influential. Again, a lobby is basically a bond group of people who try
actively to influence legislative arena. The hate sentiment against Islam in
the States is necessarily impacted with the power of lobbyism. So, law in
the States isn't independent. It's constantly influenced and manipulated by
proactive lobbyists. So, American legislation is attributable to be
illimitably rectified, regurgitated, modified and inevitably aligned with
the highest amount that is to be paid. Republicans are sponsored by certain
lobbies and so Democrats. Thence, neither party is politically autonomous.
Each one of them is possessed, financed and wholly controlled by external
bodies. So, opinion is essentially promoted based on how much is paid. Is
this an honourable system?
Leastwise, it is the worst legislative model that has ever maneuvered on
earth. Needless to say, each and every lobby of these as for the gun and
Israel one has its own media to broadly promote its notion.
Muslims in the States are misrepresented because they're often talked about
by others who're not impartial. To the contrary, at any rate, they're
prejudiced about them. If Muslims had enough money to pay those lobbyists,
they would have displaced their major rivals. Truly, the situation is
inextricable. So, it's nothing about stiff principles or invariant
convictions. It's all about, how much is someone willing to pay? The higher
you pay, the closer I'm going to be leaned toward your side. So, ladies and
gentlemen, this is how things work. It is indeed, the filthiest system I
ever encountered. In actuality, this is how Trump was brought to oval office
and this is how's he being protected despite his irreconcilably punishable
offences. Well, I'm done.
--
(Seeking knowledge is compulsory from cratle to grave because it is a
shoreless ocean.)
