Hello E., Once again, no arguments from me here. Personally, I usually won't validate a book unless it is listed as having an "excellent" rating. I do also feel that there should be absolutely no missing pages in the submitted book. If modifications need to be made, leave those up to the validator. ----- Original Message ----- From: "E." <thoth93@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 9:58 AM Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: bookshare is sharing among disabled people so what can you expect? What is difficult about scanning a preface, introduction or foreword. I understand an index having errors. Books in a bibliography can be easily scanned and validated. We volunteers have been scanning and validating this supposed non-core content for years. Let's assume volunteers want to do a good job. If we lose those few who do not produce quality scans then the validators will have better books to validate. This is the reason bookshare no longer accepts "poor" scans. Validating needs to be done carefully or not done at all. We are doing a lot of bso books because validating standards and submit standards were once lower. Let's move on from producing a lot of books to producing well scanned well validated additions to the collection. We are likely to lose volunteers if we let them input poor work. Who wants to validate a bunch of "poor" scans for example? E. To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line. To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.