[bksvol-discuss] Re: Validation of books
- From: "Julie Morales" <inlovewithchrist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 12:58:05 -0700
Hi, Lea. I think the general consensus is that RTF is better, but as long as
page breaks are present in your TXT files, I wouldn't think it would matter
that much. As for announcing when you're finished validating something, that's
entirely up to you. Some do and some don't. There's no rule about it. It does
help people know where their books are if they submitted something, but other
than that, it's up to you. Take care.
Julie Morales
inlovewithchrist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Windows/MSN Messenger (but not email):
mercy0421@xxxxxxxxxxx
Skype: mercy0421
----- Original Message -----
From: Pascha Lea
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 10:53 AM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Validation of books
Hi folks,
I noticed that a lot of people announce when they've downloaded books they've
scanned. Is it appropriate to notify the list when you've finished validating a
book? If so, I have just finished validating "Cat's Eye" by Margaret Atwood. If
it's not appropriate, I won't announce it anymore :)
I've decided that I'm going to try to get a copy of the book from the local
library when validating. I got a copy of "Cat's Eye" and it really helped out!
Scanners are fiddly things at the best of times.
Just out of curiosity, is it better to do things in .txt or .rtf format? Or
does it not matter? I've been saving everything as a .txt file.
Lea
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail
Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour
Other related posts:
