[bksvol-discuss] Re: Proofing Question: Put back or plod through it?
- From: Laura Shannon <brighteyes324@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 09:48:15 -0400
Hi all,
Thanks everyone. I did reject it with a detailed note of what was wrong
with it in the comments. I did try to fix it, but it simply was taking too
much time and meant I could not get other books into the collection in a
timely fashion.
Regards,
Laura
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Martha Rafter <mlhr@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ugh! There’s no way that this scan can be “fixed” without a print copy
> and a lot (too much) of work. Reject it.
> Marty
>
> *From:* Laura Shannon <brighteyes324@xxxxxxxxx>
> *Sent:* Saturday, July 28, 2012 11:57 PM
> *To:* bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [bksvol-discuss] Proofing Question: Put back or plod through
> it?
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've been plodding through this book (which has 469 pages). I can fix it,
> but I am wondering if it would be better to send it back for a better scan.
> Each page has all the words together with the page number right at the end
> of the last line. No dialog is separated out, no paragraphs, nothing. Like
> I said, I've been plodding through it but with 469 pages of this it is
> going to take a long, long long time.
>
> Should I just drop a note why this one is taking so long and I keep
> renewing it, or return it saying it needs to be re-scanned?
>
> Thanks
>
> Laura
>
Other related posts:
