[bksvol-discuss] Re: Proofing Question: Put back or plod through it?
- From: Laura Shannon <brighteyes324@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 23:54:18 -0400
Hi Cindy,
I don't have that ISBN number on this copy though it has 2 and both are
listed as hard covers. You could proof from any copy though because my
issue had been the dialog later on. It became hard to discern when one
person speaking turned into the other person speaking because it was all
together. The page numbers are there at the end of the big paragraph and
the page breaks are all there.
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Cindy <popularplace@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> o.k. Is the ISBN number: 9780312651220 (that's the hard cover edition.
> I'll write to madeleine. I can't find it anywhere to check the history. I
> can get the hard cover edition. I don't know if I can get the paperback,
> but doesn't matter. I can proof from the hardcover.
>
>
>
> --- On *Sun, 7/29/12, Laura Shannon <brighteyes324@xxxxxxxxx>* wrote:
>
>
> From: Laura Shannon <brighteyes324@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Proofing Question: Put back or plod through
> it?
> To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Sunday, July 29, 2012, 6:33 PM
>
>
> Hi Cindy,
>
> No there are no tables in it. It's a fiction book called Bonnie, by Iris
> Johansen published in 2011. It is actually a very interesting book. I've
> already rejected it though with comments so if you wanted to give it a go
> you'd have to contact Madeleine I suppose.
>
> Laura
>
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Cindy
> <popularplace@xxxxxxxxx<http://mc/compose?to=popularplace@xxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
>
> What's the book? (title and edition; it's not the one with tables, is it?
> If I can get the print book I'll do it (though not necessarily right away).
> I love boks like this. I feel I'm really earning my nonexistent salary,
> grin
> Cindy
>
>
>
> --- On *Sun, 7/29/12, Martha Rafter
> <mlhr@xxxxxxx<http://mc/compose?to=mlhr@xxxxxxx>
> >* wrote:
>
>
> From: Martha Rafter <mlhr@xxxxxxx <http://mc/compose?to=mlhr@xxxxxxx>>
> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Proofing Question: Put back or plod through
> it?
> To:
> bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<http://mc/compose?to=bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sunday, July 29, 2012, 6:31 AM
>
>
> Ugh! There’s no way that this scan can be “fixed” without a print copy
> and a lot (too much) of work. Reject it.
> Marty
>
> *From:* Laura Shannon <http://mc/compose?to=brighteyes324@xxxxxxxxx>
> *Sent:* Saturday, July 28, 2012 11:57 PM
> *To:*
> bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<http://mc/compose?to=bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> *Subject:* [bksvol-discuss] Proofing Question: Put back or plod through
> it?
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've been plodding through this book (which has 469 pages). I can fix it,
> but I am wondering if it would be better to send it back for a better scan.
> Each page has all the words together with the page number right at the end
> of the last line. No dialog is separated out, no paragraphs, nothing. Like
> I said, I've been plodding through it but with 469 pages of this it is
> going to take a long, long long time.
>
> Should I just drop a note why this one is taking so long and I keep
> renewing it, or return it saying it needs to be re-scanned?
>
> Thanks
>
> Laura
>
>
>
Other related posts:
