[bksvol-discuss] Re: Proofing Question: Put back or plod through it?
- From: "Reggie.alvarado@xxxxxxxxx" <reggie.alvarado@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 19:37:33 -0400
Cindy!
You are a gem. Made me smile with your nonexistent salary!
Reggie and Brooks
On Jul 29, 2012, at 6:01 PM, Cindy <popularplace@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
What's the book? (title and edition; it's not the one with tables, is it? If I
can get the print book I'll do it (though not necessarily right away). I love
boks like this. I feel I'm really earning my nonexistent salary, grin
Cindy
--- On Sun, 7/29/12, Martha Rafter <mlhr@xxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Martha Rafter <mlhr@xxxxxxx>
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Proofing Question: Put back or plod through it?
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sunday, July 29, 2012, 6:31 AM
Ugh! There’s no way that this scan can be “fixed” without a print copy and a
lot (too much) of work. Reject it.
Marty
From: Laura Shannon
Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2012 11:57 PM
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Proofing Question: Put back or plod through it?
Hi all,
I've been plodding through this book (which has 469 pages). I can fix it, but I
am wondering if it would be better to send it back for a better scan. Each page
has all the words together with the page number right at the end of the last
line. No dialog is separated out, no paragraphs, nothing. Like I said, I've
been plodding through it but with 469 pages of this it is going to take a long,
long long time.
Should I just drop a note why this one is taking so long and I keep renewing
it, or return it saying it needs to be re-scanned?
Thanks
Laura
Other related posts:
