Agreed! It's largely due to Dostoyevsky's outlook and his philosophy. Now, Tolstoy, on the other hand, is quite different and his female characters are quite interesting sometimes--not all the time, mind you! Chekov and Pushkin belong to this latter vein and have their own faults in that regard. Pratik Patel Interim Director Office of Special Services Queens College Director CUNY Assistive Technology Services The City University of New York ppatel@xxxxxx -----Original Message----- From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Kellie Hartmann Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2005 12:19 PM To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Dickens' novels To me, the award for the most unrealistic female characters in classic novels goes to Dostoyevsky. I've read Crime and Punishment and Brothers Karamozov, and all the women in both novels are completely neurotic! And I don't want to hear comments about all women being neurotic, because even if that's true the Dostoyevsky women are way more neurotic than even the most neurotic real-life woman! <lol> The Dostoyevsky women all need to be put in an asylum and sedated on a long-term basis, all except Raskolnikov's sister who seemed pretty normal but didn't really have much of a part in the story. It didn't even necessarily seem like Dostoyevsky hated women and so made all his female characters evil. It seemed more like he didn't understand women in the least and therefore couldn't possibly create an even remotely normal woman character. Ok, just my impressions. <grin> Kellie