Hi: I mostly do validating, and although i would like mor credit, i recognize there is no easy, efficient way for bookshare to change the system. I have validated some scans that were worth $2.50 and i have validated scans that i should have been paid $5 to tackle. (smile) I just validated a scan that had 47 pages that had duplicates, now come on, the scanner couldn't have removed those? Believe me, if all the material is there in a workable way, i will spend some time with a book, but i will just as easily reject a book if it's missing pages, etc. (i can't go to the library everytime) Overall, i have seen some really nice scans submitted. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Donna Smith" <donnafsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2004 4:01 PM Subject: [bksvol-discuss] My Thoughts on Credit values > I think the split is something like $2 for the submitter and $0.50 for the > validator. I think this is based on the assumption that the scanner will do > some clean-up before submitting. If we in fact submit a good $2 scan, then > perhaps $0.50 for validation is fair, but when the scanner doesn't clean up > before submitting, then this is not really very fair. > > I'd personally be more comfortable if there was greater equity in the > distribution of credits for submitters and validators. I've been validating > this weekend to help work down the list, and out of the eight books I've > validated, only one was an easy/$0.50 job. > > Equity in earning credits may also relieve the problem of receiving more > scans than volunteers can readily validate. > > Just my two cents worth while I take a brain break from a pretty tedious > validation. The text is beautiful, but the book is full of charts and > graphs that I'm deleting because they're just gibberish. I'm about half way > through and my dentist appointment next week is starting to look pretty > interesting. <grin> > > Peace and Hope, > > Donna > > >