Wish List (i.e., books wanted added to the collection) and books-being-scanned list available at sites below Wish List: https://wiki.benetech.org/display/BSO/Bookshare+Wish+List Books Being Scanned List: https://wiki.benetech.org/display/BSO/Books+Being+Scanned+List --- On Fri, 9/11/09, Rogerbailey81@xxxxxxx <Rogerbailey81@xxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Rogerbailey81@xxxxxxx <Rogerbailey81@xxxxxxx> > Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Holding Down the Traffic > To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Date: Friday, September 11, 2009, 11:01 AM > Well, I don't know about > others, but it seems to me that the best way to deal with my > email is to read and respond to it in the order that it > arrived. I suppose I could make my way through all of > it and save the ones I had a reply for, but that would tend > to tax my memory and give me a problem keeping ttrack of > them. The result is that often I reply to a message and a > few more messages down the queue I see that someone has > already made the same reply I did. Or, I might ask a > question and read a few messages and find out that someone > has already answered it. Yes, that makes for redundant posts > and it is another thing that keeps the list traffic high, > but it seems to me that it would be asking too much to have > everyone read everything in their in box before replying to > anything. > > > > > > > > > > > > "The end > may justify the means as long as there is something that > justifies the end. > > " Leon Trotsky > > > > > The Militant: http://www.themilitant.com > Pathfinder Press: http://www.pathfinderpress.com > > Granma International: http://granma.cu/ingles/index.html > > > _ > > > > table with 2 columns and 6 rows > > Subj: > > [bksvol-discuss] Re: Holding Down the Traffic > > Date: > > 9/11/2009 10:08:40 AM Eastern Daylight Time > > From: > > greensleeves1@xxxxxxxxx > > Reply-to: > > bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > To: > > bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Sent from the Internet > > (Details) > > table end > > > > I like to know what people are scanning and what's > being added to the > > wishlist. > > > > However, I think that books that were just approved into > the collection, not > > including John's daily list, could be forwarded to just > Cindy and Judy. > > Assuming that's all right with them, of course. > > > > There is one trend I've noticed that seems to be > diminishing and I wanted to > > say thank you to y'all for that. > > Often times, when someone asks a question, several people > reply with the > > same information. This doesn't seem to be happening > as much anymore which > > is a great thing. > > Christina > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Melissa Smith" <mdsmith25@xxxxxxxx> > > To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 9:56 AM > > Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Holding Down the Traffic > > > > Agree 100%, Mary. I joined the volunteer list, because I > was interested > > in volunteering, not general discussion. To me, > volunteering discussion > > involves all of these things you mention. Other than Cindy, > Carrie, and > > the volunteers who include their emails in the comments > sections of > > books they've submitted, I have no other way of > contacting other > > volunteers about volunteer related issues. I feel that > things like book > > recommendations, ETC belong on the bookshare discuss list. > > > > Melissa > > > > Mayrie ReNae wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > I disagree heartily with Roger. I think that > single messages > > > about books being scanned, books with which folks need > help, requests > > > for proofreaders, requests for the wish list and the > like belong on > > > the volunteer list. I would much rather see the two > and three day > > > long discussions of just about anything stopped > altogether than > > > stopping messages like the ones I mention that > actually have to do > > > with volunteering for bookshare. > > > > > > Mayrie > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > *From:* bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > [mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On > Behalf Of *Cindy > > > *Sent:* Friday, September 11, 2009 12:50 AM > > > *To:* bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > *Subject:* [bksvol-discuss] Re: Holding Down the > Traffic > > > > > > switching such items to the bookshare discuss list > rather than the > > > volunteer list would help > > > > > > Cindy > > > > > > Wish List (i.e., books wanted added to the collection) > and > > > books-being-scanned list available at sites below > > > > > > > > > > > > Wish List: > https://wiki.benetech.org/display/BSO/Bookshare+Wish+List > > > > > > Books Being Scanned List: > > > > https://wiki.benetech.org/display/BSO/Books+Being+Scanned+List > > > > > > --- On *Thu, 9/10/09, Rogerbailey81@xxxxxxx > /<Rogerbailey81@xxxxxxx>/* > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > From: Rogerbailey81@xxxxxxx > <Rogerbailey81@xxxxxxx> > > > Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Holding Down the > Traffic > > > To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Date: Thursday, September 10, 2009, 8:25 PM > > > > > > I have finally caught up with my email. I > don't know how long that > > > will last though. It would not surprise me if I > logged on tomorrow > > > and found another hundred plus messages waiting > for me. That is > > > why I would like to make a few suggestions > concerning holding down > > > list traffic. By no means do I want to try to > squelch off topic > > > threads even though they could stand to be held > down a little. > > > Besides, the next time I start one I can always > say that everybody > > > else is doing it. However, there are a few > kinds of messages we > > > could do easily without. For one thing, I think > that messages > > > announcing that a title should be added to or > removed from the > > > books being scanned list could be sent > privately to Cindy. Other > > > messages that are clearly list business but do > not need to be seen > > > by everyone on the list might be handled that > way too. It would be > > > good if you could think of whether it could or > not before you > > > post. Also, there are a lot of messages that > contain nothing but > > > thank you or congratulations or chuckle and > every now and then a > > > message that entirely consists of LOL. I really > do not see that > > > these serve any purpose at all, but if you > think they do then > > > those might be sent privately too. I just ask > you to think before > > > you click the send button and ask yourself if > this message either > > > contributes to the purpose of the list or to > the off topic thread > > > in which you are participating. I think that > part of the problem > > > is that there are just a lot of subscribers > here and that on a > > > smaller list those kind of messages would be > hardly noticed but > > > when so many people are sending them it can > really fill up the in > > > box fast. Now, even as I have been typing this > I hear the sound of > > > arriving email, so here I go falling behind > again. > > > > > > > > > "The end may justify the means as long as > there is something that > > > justifies the end. > > > " Leon Trotsky > > > > > > The Militant: > http://www.themilitant.com > > > <http://wwww.themilitant.com>Pathfinder > Press: > > > http://www.pathfinderpress.com > > > Granma International: > http://granma.cu/ingles/index.html > > > _ > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to > > bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject > line. To get a list of > > available commands, put the word 'help' by itself > in the subject line. > > > > To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to > > bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject > line. To get a list of available commands, put the word > 'help' by itself in the subject line. > > > > To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.