[bksvol-discuss] Re: Comments on Impulse by Ellen Hopkins
- From: "solsticesinger" <solsticesinger@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 18:13:00 -0600
So, if they don't read through their scans, why aren't they put up for other,
more careful, proofers to take care of?
----- Original Message -----
From: EVAN REESE
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, January 01, 2010 3:36 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Comments on Impulse by Ellen Hopkins
Nah, they don't read through their scans. I've mentioned here before that
there was evidence to show that they didn't, and this just adds to it.
Evan
----- Original Message -----
From: solsticesinger
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, January 01, 2010 3:58 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Comments on Impulse by Ellen Hopkins
I just finished reading Impulse by Ellen Hopkins, which was added to the
collection by an outsourcing group in Africa. This is one of the worst
outsourced scans I've seen. In fact, I wonder if anyone bothered to proof it at
all.
The book switched point of view often, and there was no indication of this
in the scan. Therefore, it was impossible to know which character was speaking
at any given time. In fact, due to the lack of headers, it was impossible to
determine how many narrators even existed.
I saw several very common scanning errors that could have been fixed, if
only the book had been read through. "hail" for "hall" is an example.
I really looked forward to reading this book, but was sorely disappointed
by the scan. It really does need to be redone, IMO.
Other related posts:
