[bksvol-discuss] Re: 550 books in the download queue

  • From: "Mary Otten" <maryotten@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 17:58:28 -0500

Ken,
I think there is a middle ground between some unattainable goal of perfection 
on one hand, and letting easily  fixed errors go on the other, on the grounds 
that most of us have been without access to books for much 
of our lives. I, for one, will not read a sloppy book with all kinds of junk in 
it, which detracts from my ability to follow what the author is saying. 
Occasional errors are one thing. Messed up tables are still a fact of life in 
many instances. But there is simply no reason to submit a book with blocks of 
junk that was the result of a poorly recognized graph, chart, picture, diagram 
or other object that does not ocr well or at all.  If the book is 
worth submitting, its worth taking the time to get rid of the stuff that can be 
found by using the tools that the modern ocr progarms put at our disposal.
Mary



Other related posts: