And remember, even if you are successful in creating something that any idiot can use, someone will go and invent a better idiot. Forrest, check those six respondents and see if it is an email auto response. For that you can cut them a little slack. Otherwise, rest assured they responded without bothering to read everything in the Email (or at all!) CD -----Original Message----- From: badges-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:badges-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Forrest Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 11:12 AM To: badges@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Badges - Re: Apology Don't sweat it, Carlos. So far I have had 6 people, professional investigators, who responded to an email I sent out that said, DO NOT RESPOND to this email. Seriously, some of my people must need help crossing the road. I expect I will get more responses when more of them awaken from their coma. Best Wishes, Shady Rest Home On Apr 23, 2010, at 11:59 AM, CarlGlas@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Dear Badges members, > > It wasn't my intent to invade anyone's private Email address when I re subscribed everyone to Badges. > Using the word re, which indicates previously, means that at one time you were subscribed when Badges was active and for whatever the reason when we changed over to the other format, you did not follow. Giving the benefit that perhaps the reason was because you missed the dozen or so announcements over a two month period that we were moving, your address was retained. When we returned to the Email based format, you were re subscribed. If you were previously subscribed to the Digest version, all you have to do is let me know and I will put you back. > > I value each and everyone as a member of Badges and as a friend, and ask for for your patience while we restore the list to its previous state. > > If that doesn't work, let me know and I will remove you from the list. > > > Thanks for your patience and understanding. > > > Fraternally, > > Carlos > > Badges Law Enforcement Discussion Group - Est. 1997 > Badges Law Enforcement Discussion Group - Est. 1997 Badges Law Enforcement Discussion Group - Est. 1997