Badges - Re: Apology
- From: Forrest <fj@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: badges@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 13:11:49 -0500
Don't sweat it, Carlos. So far I have had 6 people, professional
investigators, who responded to an email I sent out that said, DO NOT RESPOND
to this email. Seriously, some of my people must need help crossing the road.
I expect I will get more responses when more of them awaken from their coma.
Best Wishes,
Shady Rest Home
On Apr 23, 2010, at 11:59 AM, CarlGlas@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Dear Badges members,
>
> It wasn't my intent to invade anyone's private Email address when I re
> subscribed everyone to Badges.
> Using the word re, which indicates previously, means that at one time you
> were subscribed when Badges was active and for whatever the reason when we
> changed over to the other format, you did not follow. Giving the benefit that
> perhaps the reason was because you missed the dozen or so announcements over
> a two month period that we were moving, your address was retained. When we
> returned to the Email based format, you were re subscribed. If you were
> previously subscribed to the Digest version, all you have to do is let me
> know and I will put you back.
>
> I value each and everyone as a member of Badges and as a friend, and ask for
> for your patience while we restore the list to its previous state.
>
> If that doesn't work, let me know and I will remove you from the list.
>
>
> Thanks for your patience and understanding.
>
>
> Fraternally,
>
> Carlos
>
> Badges Law Enforcement Discussion Group - Est. 1997
>
Badges Law Enforcement Discussion Group - Est. 1997
Other related posts:
