--- Stan Gorodenski <stanlep@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > has always bothered me. For example, when I first got it I expected to > see a huge difference in a moderately light polluted area compared to > one that is like Dewey or a good dark sky site, but discovered the range > was quite small. The units that come out of the SQM are magnitudes per square arcsecond, which are the same units that real pro astronomers use when they do surface photometry. When site surveying is done for observatories, they measure sky brightness with the same scale as the SQM. I, too, am frustrated by the narrow scale of the SQM, but I don't have a suggestion for how to improve it. Tom -- See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please send personal replies to the author, not the list.