Well, ham radio operators often use a computer-controlled alt-az setup to keep antennas aimed at low-earth satellites. I think the position can easily be predicted pretty accurately if the exact location (from GPS) and time (from WWV) are available. However, for antenna aiming, accuracy of something like ~10 deg minimum is all that is typically required due to the much larger beamwidth of radio antennas. Maybe interfacing one of these programs to a LX200 or other goto mount might not be too hard? Probably to really get a lock at high power something like a ccd autoguider would be needed in addition. Torsten Clay On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, Kevin Bays wrote: > > Wow. There has got to be a better way to track a satellite. It seems that > somebody, using the right equipment, could pre-program a scope to follow > where the object would be if known ahead of time. In fact it seems like a > person could use a VERY high power if the trajectory were predicted > accurately and the telescope rigged electronically to move with it at just > the right moment. > > Anyone have any ideas on this? > --- This message is from the AZ-Observing mailing list. If you wish to be removed from this list, send E-mail to: AZ-Observing-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, with the subject: unsubscribe. The list's archive is at: //www.freelists.org/archives/az-observing This is a discussion list. Please send personal inquiries directly to the message author. In other words, do not use "reply" for personal messages. Thanks.