[AZ-Observing] Re: Proof that Astronomy Equipment and Rain are related
- From: Thad Robosson <starstarcracker@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 20:40:25 -0700
Matt Luttinen wrote:
>Well,
>
>Does a 12.5" f5.6 Carl Zambuto primary count? Or a Vixen R200SS =
>focuser/coma
>corrector? Or a pair of Dob Driver motors? Or a Feathertouch focuser? Or =
>a
>2.14" Protostar quartz secondary and curved holder?
>
>Er, sorry everybody . . .=20
>
>Matt
>
>
>-
>
>
OK, I see what the trouble is....with all these people who are owning up
to their purchases that hath wrought
havoc upon our observing, but not paying the price for it. That is, these
people need to gather up all the new toys they have purchased, make a
pilgrimage to Sentinel, and
set up under rainy skies. This will appease the cloud gods in that
gasoline was sacrificed by the
guilty parties. Sacrifices by the innocent are no longer sufficient,
and only serves to enrage the
cloud gods further.
The real "vicitims" of this malfeasance need only to stay home and
insist that these individuals only do what is moral and
right to correct the poor conditions. As such, I expect all of you who
have purchased astronomical
goods to be at Sentinel by sunset Friday night to play out your redemption.
Thad
--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
send personal replies to the author, not the list.
Other related posts:
