For what it is worth, I thought the same thing Stan. I did not think he was serious. Maybe a smiley face next time Joe? Bernard -----Original Message----- From: az-observing-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:az-observing-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David M. Douglass Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2013 10:42 AM To: az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [AZ-Observing] Re: IC2574 (Coddington's Nebula) Stan... Easy. Think about it for a second. If you were on his spam list (and such a thing IS possible...) He would have never received the message (and thus would never have sent you a reply). I think I know Joe Goss reasonably well.... And I am pretty sure he was saying that with a smile on his face ! In other words.... He was kidding with you. David M. Douglass dmdouglass@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (secondary) david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (main) Cell (602) 908-9092 -----Original Message----- From: az-observing-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:az-observing-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stan Gorodenski Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2013 10:09 AM To: az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [AZ-Observing] Re: IC2574 (Coddington's Nebula) Joe, I didn't know you had put me on a spam list. Now I do. It doesn't matter to me that I am on your list, and if others feel the same way, I have no objection. I routinely do not read messages from certain individuals. We all have that freedom. I assume since I am on your spam list it means you never got my private message in response to your public message telling me to go crawl in my hole, or something like that. If you didn't get it I won't bother telling you in public what I attempted to tell you in private. It is enlightening to know I am on your spam list. Going back many years I detected an animosity toward me from you. Since I do not know you and never socialized with you (that I can recall) it never made sense, but it appears my perception was correct. Stan On 4/13/2013 8:58 AM, Joe Goss wrote: > This is why I put you on my spam list > > Joe Goss > > > > On 4/12/2013 10:05 PM, stevecoe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >> Bernie; >> >> Great shot, lots of detail in a low surface brightness object. I >> can't image seeing any of that detail and mottling with any telescope >> I have ever owned. >> >> What does IFN mean? >> >> > Steve, > I Forget Now. > Stan > > -- See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please send personal replies to the author, not the list. -- See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please send personal replies to the author, not the list. -- See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please send personal replies to the author, not the list.