[AZ-Observing] Re: FW: RE: Re: The Web Cam
- From: "Matt Luttinen" <mluttinen@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 15:45:14 -0700
Uh, correct me if I am wrong, but don't we use
equipment to observe? I for one am very interested
in web cam type stuff, and welcome posts like yours.
It is true that this is not a group dedicated to
equipment, but I think that relevant topics as they arise
have a place here.
Observing equipment discussions seem appropriate to me,
within reason.
Anyone who has subscribed to az observing for any
length of time knows that there is a lot of comradeship
and often obtuse subject matter (Arizona nebula, sorry
group, that one was mine) presented here.
Stan, I see no apology necessary.
Matt
PS: What's better, refractors or reflectors?
-----Original Message-----
From: az-observing-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:az-observing-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stanley A.
Gorodenski
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:48 PM
To: az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [AZ-Observing] Re: FW: RE: Re: The Web Cam
What is inappropriate for Arizona Observing, i.e., this discussion
group? If I
have transgressed the line, my sincere apologies. However, I felt my
initial
post was helpful to everyone inside and outside of EVAC by providing
additional information to those who were at the meeting, and by making
everyone aware of this other aspect of Arizona observing who did not
attend or
are not EVAC members. In fact, Tom did provide a positive in-depth
response to
my message to which I additionally responded, but I retract everything
if my
post(s) was(were) inappropriate.
Not intending to start a controversy, sincerely,
Stan
Tom Polakis wrote:
> obvious answer! I'm hoping to reply only to Stan and Jeff, as this
> discussion has the potential of cluttering a list that's supposed to
be
> about Arizona observing, not equipment. Thanks.
--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
send personal replies to the author, not the list.
Other related posts:
