[AZ-Observing] Re: Cherry Rd II - the site
- From: "George Kolb" <gkolb@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 18:17:22 -0700
Ken,
My only suggestion is to return to the initial frame of mind we had in
finding our early dark sky sites. It is getting harder and harder to find
and maintain good dark sky sites. Blaming the government and other negative
comments only proves to add to the problem. I meant no disrespect to anyone
on this forum. I'm just sensitive to allogations against the government,
and anyone - ref the text: "the wrath of some federal bureaucracy?" The
government is made up of people like you and me. It is simple in my mind,
either do something, run for office or stop complaining.
Regards - George
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ken Reeves" <kreeves@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 6:06 PM
Subject: [AZ-Observing] Re: Cherry Rd II - the site
>
> George,
>
> Steve Coe and I spent quite a bit of time looking around that general area
> inMay without any luck.
>
> Do you have any suggestions?
>
> Ken Reeves
>
> George Kolb wrote:
> Pardon me for saying so, but if this site is causing this much problem,
> find
> another place. You should be enjoying the dark night skies of the area and
> not so concerned about the politics. Again - excuse my wrath and sorry for
> being open and honest. Regards - George Kolb Ahwatukee ----- Original
> Message----- From: "AJ Crayon" <acrayon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>[1] To: "SAC Forum"
> <sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>[2]; "AZ Observing"
> <az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>[3]
> Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 5:18 PM Subject: [AZ-Observing] Cherry Rd II -
> the site This past weekend was first time for me at this site as was for
> David Frederickson and Matt Listening. Upon arriving there we discovered a
> USForest Service sign that David and Matt went back to read. It was on a
> 3"X3"X3', was yellow and black that said things like road closed and
> erosion
> along with some other statements, which I don't recall. The concern is,
> giventhe sign, is this site really usable with incurring thewrath of some
> federal bureaucracy? There was other information on the sign but don't
> remember exactly what David and Matt indicated. Perhaps they can add or
> change what I've said so far. The main concern here is, as I've said, is
> thissite usable without breaking some law or laws. Anyone have any ideas
> about this sign? Thanks and clear skies, aj -- See message header for info
> onlist archives or unsubscribing, and please send personal replies to the
> author, not the list. -- See message header for info on list archives or
> unsubscribing, and please send personal replies to the author, not the
> list.
>
>
> --- Links ---
> 1 mailto:acrayon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 2 mailto:sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 3 mailto:az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> --
> See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
> send personal replies to the author, not the list.
>
>
--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
send personal replies to the author, not the list.
Other related posts:
