atw: Re: Inaction items
- From: "Steve Hudson" <adslyy5g@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:27:16 +1000
Stewie, I have seen this stuff before. It is oft put under "Future action
actions", "To be discussed later pending <outcomes>" etc. I wont assume you
are being disparaging, I will just say it is fairly common to have all input
from a meeting output as comments for future action - like any good process
all inputs must be rep'd by an output because the second law of
thermodynamics holds true for data.
-----Original Message-----
From: Stuart Burnfield
Bede said:
> "At the meeting, a number of issues were identified and addressed" --
> we didn't actually do anything but we sure addressed those issues we
> identified ...
You must work with a bunch of action-oriented go-getters.
I've only gone as far as identifying issues to be addressed.
We were never precipitous enough to actually address the issues that were
identified...
**************************************************
To post a message to austechwriter, send the message to
austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe to austechwriter, send a message to
austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "subscribe" in the Subject field.
To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
"unsubscribe" in the Subject field.
To search the austechwriter archives, go to
www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter
To contact the list administrator, send a message to
austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
**************************************************
Other related posts:
