Should we write about holding KRT intensive training workshops at COESME,
participation of IISER faculty in the Ashram school engagement (e.g. in
material development, Bhas coming as a representative of IISER instead of
in an individual capacity to the Amravati workshop), and something else
like students' participation?
On Thu, 7 Dec 2017 at 17:18, Uma Sudhir <uma.eklavya@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I am not sure if such a general letter is what is required. Shouldn't
there be some specifics?
On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 4:20 PM, Anish Mokashi <anish.dot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Satyajit Rath had suggested :
Secondly, IISER, Pune. I have now talked with Shashi (Shashidhara) as
well as Bhas and Vineeta. Shashi is very enthusiastic about pretty much all
the tentative plans that Anish had summarised (although how much will
actually happen is somewhat unclear!). However, again, it would be good
to start by having formal letters go to him asking for collaborative
assistance from both you and the government of Maharashtra, and again, I
will be glad to work with you on those drafts. Shashi pointed out (and Bhas
agreed) that IISER-Pune already has a funded effort going on called COESME
which is very appropriate for this purpose (
http://www.iiserpune.ac.in/outreach/coesm, and of which he is currently
the head. So the letters should go to Shashi as head, COESME, to begin
with. Shashi too suggests that he will invite Eklavya to come down for a
meeting, and we can take it on from there in all these directions.
Could you go through this draft? Tried to keep it non-specific for now -
as the KRTs & youth-workshops and other academic engagement details can
come later (?). Once we make this pucca, we could send it to Bhas, Vineeta
and Satyajit for their suggestions.
The Google document is: