[AR] Re: Space-X escape engines

  • From: "John Dom" <johndom@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 22:19:46 +0100

Poisonous indeed but, talking manrated, all Apollo landers had that
hypergolic biprop aboard for RCS and for their landing/return engines.

Before, Gemini capsules used it for RCS because Mercury 90 % HP sieve
catalyst packs RCS had proven less reliable. The Titan Gemini carriers also
ran it.

Space shuttle OMS, likewise.

jd



From: arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of qbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: vrijdag 13 november 2015 21:51
To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [AR] Re: Space-X escape engines



With the following statements taken from Wikipedia and backed by other
sites, I'm trying to make sense of a "MAN RATED" capsule having UDMH/NTO
motors right next to the escape hatch.


UDMH is toxic, a carcinogen <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carcinogen> and
can explode in the presence of oxidizers.
It can be absorbed through skin. During the 1980s there was concern about
the levels of UDMH in various foods being a cancer risk, especially for
apple juice <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_juice> .
UDMH released into the environment can react in air to form
dimethylnitrosamine <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimethylnitrosamine> , a
persistent carcinogen and groundwater pollutant

From Wikipedia


At 07:30 AM 11/13/2015, you wrote:



http://www.gizmag.com/spacex-superdraco-engines/40374/?utm_source=Gizmag+Sub
scribers
<http://www.gizmag.com/spacex-superdraco-engines/40374/?utm_source=Gizmag+Su
bscribers&utm_campaign=0d72424435-UA-2235360-4&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_6
5b67362bd-0d72424435-90232926>
&utm_campaign=0d72424435-UA-2235360-4&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_65b67362bd
-0d72424435-90232926

looks like a UDMH/NTO propellant.

jd

Other related posts: