[AR] Re: Another failed small launch company

  • From: William Claybaugh <wclaybaugh2@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 07:24:24 -0600

Paul:

Do you know something specific about events at Vector or are you expressing
a personal dislike?

Bill

On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 8:40 PM Paul Breed <paul@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

IMHO I think Vector failed precisely because of Cantril.


On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 2:34 PM David Arnold <davida@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

As a complete outsider, he appeared to create a fairly high profile for
the company in a fairly crowded field. That often helps in attracting
interest (investment, customers, employees).

I can’t speak for any other of his qualities, and it’s possible even this
profile was more the work of a marketing team than him individually
(although it didn’t feel like that).



d

On 11 Aug 2019, at 10:54, Ben Brockert <wikkit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 4:11 PM adam paul <pauladam316@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Wow, I always figured vector would make it. I knew the smallsat launch
market couldn’t support all the new upcoming companies, but vector seemed
like they had a good shot being led by James Cantrell.


What led you to think that having Cantrell would increase their odds of
success?




Other related posts: