Le Lundi 20 Mars 2006 09:20, Graeme Gill a écrit : > The claim that "sRGB has a really small gamut" is > rather a simplification and exaggeration. What perhaps is really > meant, is that it does not cover a lot of gamut that is captured > by photographic film, or printable by many printers. There is still > a lot of sRGB gamut that can't be printed on any printer! I was on the LGM, on friday: it was very interesting :o) Marti Maria (LittleCMS) said that sRGB covers 80% of the colors a human can see. I was very surprised, because sRGB covers only 30% of Lab colorspace (in area), and AdobeRGB98, 50%. I thought that Lab represents all colors a human can see. So, are sRGB/AdobeRGB98 cover nearly all colors, or not ? If not, what are the colors from real world which can't be represented ? -- Frédéric http://www.gbiloba.org