[argyllcms] Spyder2 Questions

  • From: Bob Coss <bobcoss@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2011 22:40:38 -0400

Hi All,

I just setup a Spyder2 to do calibration of my Ubuntu box with inexpensive
TN LCD panels.   I also need to calibrate my XP box with old CRT displays.


1. For Spyder2 under argyll, do you use the LCD baffle when calibrating like
you do for the vendor software?
2. The vendor's software didn't provide an option for calibrating ambient
light.   Should I measure with the LCD baffle on?   My I1D2 had a white
plastic cover that you use when measuring ambient.   Should I use something
like that?

Thank you in advance,


On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Florian Höch wrote:
> > Graeme, regarding the slower measurement speed of the ColorMunki
> > Display, do you think this a hardware difference or maybe a difference
> > in firmware? I'm just curious. I only know from one unofficial source
> > which previously stated that they should be about the same (in speed)
> > when used with the same software (ie. when using the ColorMunki with i1
> > Profiler), but it seems that was just a rumor?
> My guess is that the firmware adds about a 1 second delay to each
> reading (or maybe imposes a minimum of 1 second per reading). The
> instruments otherwise seem to operate identically, including the
> integration time set, which is a lot less than 1 second.
> So in terms of differentiating the two products, X-Rite have been
> smart in making it something that a different driver can't overcome.
> Graeme Gill.

Hay que aprender algo nuevo todos los días

Other related posts: