> Have you measured the actual printed patch size to verify no unexpected scaling has occurred? I use double-sided ruler which have exactly 5 rows width, so there was no error. > If you suspect version 1.6.3 then suggest dropping back to 1.6.2 to verify nothing hasn't been corrupted in v1.6.3. v1.6.2 is well proven and definitely doesn't have the problems you are encountering. Ok, I will try 1.6.2 chartread soon 2014-02-17 20:39 GMT+02:00 BC Rider <bcrider99@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > >> How have you printed the chart ? > > Chart was printed from ACPU on OS X > > > > Have you measured the actual printed patch size to verify no > unexpected scaling has occurred? > > What size are the measured patches (best to measure 10 or > more patches and divide)? > > > > > Maybe newer chartread with ColorMunki give bigger read errors in some > > cases? > > If you suspect version 1.6.3 then suggest dropping back to 1.6.2 to verify > nothing > hasn't been corrupted in v1.6.3. v1.6.2 is well proven and definitely > doesn't > have the problems you are encountering. > > Could it be a Ubuntu problem? My tests are all assuming Windows 7. >