[aodvv2-discuss] Re: RFC 6621 considerations
- From: Charlie Perkins <charles.perkins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: aodvv2-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 13:58:15 -0700
Hello Vicky,
On 10/6/2015 1:38 PM, Victoria Mercieca wrote:
So the constraint on sending is independent from what might have been
received? What if RREQ_Gen was running 6621 and it decided it didn't
need to send the RREQ? I thought 6621 was about whether to resend an
identical copy of a received multicast message? Sorry for my
confusion, this isn't part of the actual interoperability question.
Just can't get my head around it :-/
Well, any *source* of a multicast packet does need to send the message.
If this is really confusing, then we could explicitly say that
regeneration of a RREQ does not count as originating the multicast message.
Or if that is not enough, I can write an Internet Draft citing RFC 6621
to explain the difference. If that is desired, please just let me know.
Regards,
Charlie P.
Other related posts:
