[adtools] Re: native GCC 4.2.4 and unix/amiga pathes...

  • From: Jens Langner <Jens.Langner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: adtools@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 01:12:55 +0200

Hello Andrija,

On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 11:51:45 +0200, Andrija Antonijevic wrote:

> On 22-Jun-2008, Jens Langner wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 11:22:51 +0200, Henning Nielsen Lund wrote:
> [...]
>>>> Any idea what might be wrong in our current patches? Henning, do you
>>>> have any idea if your shared changes broke something in the
>>>> Unix->Amiga path conversion routines in some way?
>>>
>>> As I have made no changes to the sourcecode, should that not make a
>>> change. Did you built the binaries with LIBS=-lunix
>>
>> Well, I built GCC 4.2.4 like I built 4.2.3 about a month ago. Perhaps
>> something have to be changed in the default built environment when
>> building a native version of GCC? Any idea? Perhaps we have to add
>> -lunix per default when building GCC?
>
> Have look at the thread titled "how to build a new native OS4 gcc?" on
> this list, more specifically, the last message in it.

Oh damn, I totally forgot about that. Thanks for the hint as this solved my
issue and now I was able to successfully build a working OS4 native GCC
including shared libraries.

Thanks.

cheers,
jens
-- 
Jens Langner, Dresden/Germany
http://www.jens-langner.de/

No proper program contains an indication which as an operator-applied
occurrence identifies an operator-defining occurrence which as an
indication-applied occurrence identifies an indication-defining
occurrence different from the one identified by the given indication as
an indication-applied occurrence.
-- ALGOL 68 Report

______________________________________________________________________________
Amiga Development tools ML - //www.freelists.org/list/adtools
Homepage...................: http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/adtools
Listserver help............: mailto:adtools-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?Subject=HELP

Other related posts: