Hello Andrija, On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 11:51:45 +0200, Andrija Antonijevic wrote: > On 22-Jun-2008, Jens Langner wrote: > >> On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 11:22:51 +0200, Henning Nielsen Lund wrote: > [...] >>>> Any idea what might be wrong in our current patches? Henning, do you >>>> have any idea if your shared changes broke something in the >>>> Unix->Amiga path conversion routines in some way? >>> >>> As I have made no changes to the sourcecode, should that not make a >>> change. Did you built the binaries with LIBS=-lunix >> >> Well, I built GCC 4.2.4 like I built 4.2.3 about a month ago. Perhaps >> something have to be changed in the default built environment when >> building a native version of GCC? Any idea? Perhaps we have to add >> -lunix per default when building GCC? > > Have look at the thread titled "how to build a new native OS4 gcc?" on > this list, more specifically, the last message in it. Oh damn, I totally forgot about that. Thanks for the hint as this solved my issue and now I was able to successfully build a working OS4 native GCC including shared libraries. Thanks. cheers, jens -- Jens Langner, Dresden/Germany http://www.jens-langner.de/ No proper program contains an indication which as an operator-applied occurrence identifies an operator-defining occurrence which as an indication-applied occurrence identifies an indication-defining occurrence different from the one identified by the given indication as an indication-applied occurrence. -- ALGOL 68 Report ______________________________________________________________________________ Amiga Development tools ML - //www.freelists.org/list/adtools Homepage...................: http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/adtools Listserver help............: mailto:adtools-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?Subject=HELP