Wake up world.com *senate-doc-43*-proof you don't -own -any -property
https://www.printfriendly.com/p/g/wHFyBW
https://foundationfortruthinlaw.org/Files/The-
TRUTH-About-the-UNITED-STATES-GOVERNMENT-BANKRUPTCY.pdf
on Page 11 excerpt from the above article.
What your birth 'certificate' really is, is just a 'Certificate of Title'
to the U.S. citizen, just like you get for your car. Legally, you don't own
the fictional U.S. citizen, and legally you don't own your car. The
government holds the title to both of them, and issues you a Certificate of
Title for your car and a Birth Certificate for the U.S. citizen. They are
claiming this property as theirs by presumption. And it is, until you rebut
this presumption. In the past you have gone along with this presumption
because you didn't know the truth. You are the true owner of this property,
your birth certificate. The government is just a holder of this property.
so if you rebut the presumption..1817 and claim not a U.S. Citizen but a
state national.. does this include your auto? with their title..
and how in the heck does that work for getting the traffic tickets
dismissed based on personal (wo/man) jurisdiction by claiming 1817?
. so then this must apply to the auto as ones own personal home goods
property. non commercial? yes or no?
How does one go about rebutting the presumption for the Motor Vehicle
code ?? has anyone done this?
On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 7:21 AM veritas ghost <guyettedamien8@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
if you go over to supremelaw.org and look at cases paul has litigated, it
lays out how he was doing it. they have no jurisdiction to talk to you,
they have no right to coerce you into registration or contract(s), or into
getting a tax called a license.
GIBSON, Chief Justice (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania) opinion of the
Court: "Every highway, toll or free, is licensed, constructed, and
regulated by the immediate or delegated action of the sovereign power, and
in every commonwealth the people in the aggregate constitute the sovereign.
But it is the prerogative of a sovereign to be exempt from coercion by
action, for jurisdiction implies sovereignty, and a sovereign can have no
superior.". O'Connor v. Pittsburgh, 18 Pa. 187 (1851). (Same in 42 Pa.C.C.
579 (1914))
On Sat, Apr 17, 2021, 2:25 AM Russell Lee <russell.lee.2012@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
It seems to me that a refusal could be presumed that there is no Oath of
Office.
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 11:29 PM J_B <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
question is how to get it if the court clerk wont hand it over
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 7:35 PM Russell Lee <russell.lee.2012@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
This might seem off-point but has anyone been checking these public
officers for their oath of office? If they have no oath of office, they're
impersonating a public officer and are liable in their personal capacity.
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 3:44 PM jonbondo@xxxxxxxxx <jonbondo@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
if you auto *was* titled it still is and *ever* registered . even
though not currently.. it belongs to the state and it is *not*
household goods.
the 1817 may be about the man/woman jurisdiction. claim; but i do
not think it includes ones Auto. so i say NO its not your household
goods; you are not safe.. .
if you cover the vin. and you are not in the database.. they may
assume its stolen. or you may have to prove it isn't..
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 9:58 AM veritas ghost <
guyettedamien8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
That the king of England, as sovereign of the nation, is said to be
independent of all, and subject to no one but God: and his crown is
stiled
imperial, on purpose to assert that he owes no kind of subjection to any
potentate on earth. No compulsory action can be brought against him, even
in his own courts. That a sovereign, when in a foreign country, is
always
considered by civilized nations, as exempt from its jurisdiction,
privileged from arrests, and not subject to its laws. Hence this
inference
was drawn, that the court having no jurisdiction over Virginia, all its
process against that state, must be coram non judice, and consequently
void. 1 Vatt.P. 2. 133. 2. Vatt. 158. 1 Blackft. 141. 5 Bac. 450. It was
then observed, that there being no instance in our law books, of any
process against a sovereign, it was proper to consider the rules of law
relative to process against their representatives. [* * *]
That the true reason of the minister's exemption from process is the
independence and sovereignty of the person he represents. And although by
engaging in trade, he may so far divest himself of his public character,
as
to subject these goods to attachment, yet in every case where he
represents
his master, his property is sacred. But a sovereign cannot subject
himself
by implication: he must do it expressly. M'Carty v. Nixon et al, 1 U.S.
77
(1784)
JOHNSON, J. (the supreme Court of the United States):The right of
jurisdiction is essentially connected to, or rather identified with, the
national sovereignty [We the People! ]. To part with it is to commit a
species of political suicide. In fact, a power to produce its own
annihilation is an absurdity in terms. It is a power as utterly
incommunicable to a political as to a natural person. FLETCHER v. PECK,
10
U.S. 87 (1810)
BARTLEY, C. J. (Supreme Court of Ohio) dissented: There is no
tribunal before which the sovereign can be arraigned, his conduct
examined,
his errors and delinquencies detected, those errors corrected, and he
punished. PIQUA STATE BANK OF OHIO v. KNOUP, 6 Ohio St. 342 (1856).
Justice BREWER (Supreme Court of the United States) dissenting: The
government of the United States is one of limited and delegated powers.
It
takes nothing from the usages or the former action of European
governments,
nor does it take any power by any supposed inherent sovereignty. There
is a
great deal of confusion in the use of the word 'sovereignty' by law
writers. Sovereignty or supreme power is in this country vested in the
people, and only in the people. [***] When, therefore, power is exercised
by congress, authority for it must be found in express terms in the
constitution, or in the means necessary or proper for the execution of
the
power expressed. If it cannot be thus found, it does not exist. FONG YUE
TING v. UNITED STATES, 149 U.S. 698 (1893)
Law of Nations, Book 2 Article 132: "God has created heaven for
himself and his saints, and has given the earth to mankind, intending it
for the advantage of the poor as well as of the rich. The roads are for
their use, and God has not subjected them to any taxes." [a license is a
tax and a automobile is household goods.]
25 AM JUR (1st) Highways, Sec. 163. "No State government entity has
the power to allow or deny passageon the highways, byways, nor waterways
transporting his vehicles andpersonal property for either recreation or
business, but by being subject only to local regulation i.e., safety,
caution, traffic lights, speed limits, etc. Travel is not a privilege
requiring, licensing, vehicle registration, or forced insurances."
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021, 12:47 AM ejartz <ejartz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Are you a person, is the vin on a motor vehicle or a household good
or consumer good?
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021, 8:23 PM J_B <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
? go for it all
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 7:31 PM NELSON DICE <nelsondice@xxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I am thinking only cover the ViN if no plates on car and no
registration
Get Outlook for Android <https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
------------------------------
*From:* administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <
administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Jb <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* Thursday, April 15, 2021 12:39:49 PM
*To:* administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <
administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
*Subject:* [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: ok to remove
or cover VIN of personal property?
It’s legal to cover it
On Apr 15, 2021, at 12:26 PM, NELSON DICE <nelsondice@xxxxxxxx>
wrote:
https://law.justia.com/codes/new-jersey/2019/title-2c/section-2c-17-6/
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flaw.justia.com%2Fcodes%2Fnew-jersey%2F2019%2Ftitle-2c%2Fsection-2c-17-6%2F&data=04%7C01%7C%7Cd381d91f67384a59c5d408d90044ba00%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637541117438894432%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=pb8LiuLh8%2Fl30QaFCZxTpwqhMDySOOLHmMZ4v8%2FSzIo%3D&reserved=0>
