Opinion: Why we should be wary of Canada’s plan to ban Holocaust denial
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
| |
Opinion: Why we should be wary of Canada’s plan to ban Holocaust denial
It is unquestionably a poisonous opinion. But we should resist using the power
of the state to prohibit Holocaus...
|
|
|
We should try (better) to understand as much (where we don't? Ahh, but how to
Know, if not, be more, if not, what there is, to communication) or, I suppose
it would remain, politics and abuse (injustice) as usual. This is calling
you/us abusive and part of the problem if not of the entire problem, otherwise
I may as well interject here that where a state, including a so-called
democracy doesn't subsidize "justice care," as the priority, re., deal with the
grievances (and supportive ideas, to what matters and more should) myriad and
legion by the, constituency... that we would be "represented" in such regard,
and not lied to and about, it, things (if not as we pathetically know them,
otherwise) will remain a dictatorship (of abuse, of The not So reasonable and
reasoning and of the individual if not of Individualism, and true justice) of
Sorts, as with injustice if not war and genocide in "cruise mode" or, political
human mode, if you will
So far ahead of the curve and calling things for what they are, from The,
perspective, encompassing the genocides going on and of the past, I Go
Or what? Just Get It, or you won't, relative to Individualism and what, So
matters
to Justice.
Champion of as much
On Monday, April 18, 2022, 11:32:49 a.m. EDT, Michael Glavic
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Opinion: Why we should be wary of Canada’s plan to ban Holocaust denial
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
| |
Opinion: Why we should be wary of Canada’s plan to ban Holocaust denial
It is unquestionably a poisonous opinion. But we should resist using the power
of the state to prohibit Holocaus...
|
|
|
More or less agreed, in such respect.. We should temper our reaction to as
much, including what we say, with the understanding that genocide, if not as
far as I'm concerned, So objective and of justice in such regard, vs., the
political if not socially compromised, is a premeditated (organized, if not
well thought out and planned for and carried out) action and not what we (if
not merely I) associate with the heat (including anger and hatred, including
confusion/disorder) or fervour of war, of battles, (and how to win them) for
the extermination of something fundamental to the just way, of life, beyond the
conflict of war, as where one has the power and authority to commit genocide to
a subjugated people.
More fundamentally, as to what is reasonable if not most, to individualism and
a mind of reason and justice in such regard, genocide should be considered of
anything that limits or denies the communicative, of what substantially or
primarily supports our rights and responsibilities and existence as for
independence and objectivity in such regard.
I will add that we should concern ourselves, most with the forces that deny as
much to what is most fundamental to serving justice.
Champion of Justice
