[administrating-your-public-servants] Re: Taking action and thinking critically to cause journalists and politicians to read your story and ask: What did Judge K Brown Jack

From: "Don Mashak" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ("donmashak")
To: "administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 05:06:14 +0000 (UTC)

Towards Establishing A Truer Perspective of Reality Among US Citizens
https://donmashakshennepincountymnfreepressnews.wordpress.com/2022/04/22/toward-establishing-a-truer-perspective-of-reality-among-us-citizens-hacia-el-establecimiento-de-una-perspectiva-mas-real-de-la-realidad-entre-los-ciudadanos-estadounidenses-%e5%9c%a8/

Those were my thoughts.

Thank you for your time.

In Liberty,
Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot

    On Sunday, April 24, 2022, 11:18:17 PM CDT, Mike <leatherlips1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Look at number 11 in this list. I highlighted the two words I think you should
leave out. I would just claim the beneficiary position. They didn’t bring you
into the court, they brought the trust in and you are the beneficiary of that
trust. 63 Am Jur 247 says the public servants are the trustees of the trust so
ask them how they plane on benefiting you.  From: Aéius Cercle of
Quantum-Note(Law-Division) Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2022 7:16 PMTo:
administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject:
[administrating-your-public-servants] Re: [administrating-your-public-servants]
Re: [administrating-your-public-servants] Taking action and thinking critically
to cause journalists and politicians to read your story and ask: What did Judge
K Brown Jackson, Attorney General M Garland, and Justice Thomas know about
judges’ abuse of power and when did they know it?
Psych-Evaluations are just another layer-of-FRAUD designed to get you POISONED.
I filed ... well, whatever it was I filed (whether complaint, estoppel, notice
of void-judgement, etc), I basically described that, due to the magistrate
ordering a psych-evaluation with neither my consent/permission nor knowledge,
knowing that psychotropic-drugs are toxic substances, and, that knowing it is
near-impossible for anybody to not to get «diagnosed» with «something» ...I
basically described it as an act of ATTEMPTED MURDER.

Whilst said magistrate's name does still show up in public, listed as a judge,
and, upon the boards of the court-house, his name is the only name where there
are NO «cases» assigned to him (although this might have something to do with
exposing the fraud of the Cestui Que Trust, and, describing how there was an
ADMIRALTY FLAG present at the front of the court-room)...

I probably should have taken photos of the postings, the ones where the papers
posted onto the walls or the glass-panes show whose names are assigned to which
judge at specified rooms at specific times of the day along with their
case-numbers, for illustration-purposes, but, not to digress...

...just don't count on ANY «psychiatrist» to have a CLUE (would a Frenchman be
assigned to a German in order for the German to determine whether the Frenchman
is «competent» at speaking Japanese [or even French] ? Similarly, sending a
«psychiatrist» to evaluate whether a «sovereign» [which you are failing to do
by the way if you haven't essentially «taken command» of the direction of the
proceedings as the de jure judge rather than letting that de facto judge lead
you by the bull-horns] is «competent» at «law» is like that... I am of the
opinion that such a «condition» should be OBJECTED on the rounds that
psychiatrists neither study nor know anything about LAW; and, IF the
«psychiatrist» INSISTS upon doing ANYTHING that even may result in any kind of
forced drugging, assuming the matter gets that far, I would think it prudent to
put said psychiatrist ON NOTICE that, IF he thinks him «qualified» to
«evaluate» matters of LAW, then, he should have NO PROBLEM being able to
«defend himself in court» on his OWN, and WITHOUT A LAWYER/ATTORNEY, otherwise,
I would also deem said «psychiatrist» as «incompetent» to evaluate).

Side-Note : I have been through these «evaluations» before, and, despite
scoring well-over 85% (or even over 90%) in EVERY category, the ONE thing that
these dumb-ass idiot-psychiatrists used as a determination of «non-competence»
was because I would NOT answer that «cops» are some-how the «good guys» (like,
seriously, what kind of moron living under a god-damn ROCK in this day and age
believes that «cops» are «good guys» with ALL of the
statistics/reports/videos/etc., of MURDER and TREASON being committed by cops
on a DAILY freaking basis)...! You are better off just «calling off» the
«evaluation» if you don't want to end up getting potentially
«institutionalised» and «stuck» within some sort of psych-ward; I don't know
where you're at in your learning/study/journey of establishing your
sovereignty, but, I would «claim my throne» (metaphorically speaking) before
them, and, immediately start issuing the ORDERS that THEY (MY Servants, yes,
SERVANTS) are supposed to be following, even if I have to sternly say :
«SERVANT ! [pointing at black-robed pseud-judge] You are now forbidden from
speaking any further until I give you permission to continue speaking...
[black-robed imposter may try to order the bailiffs to arrest the king, but,
the bailiffs are also under MY «orders» and had best stay put IF they do not
wish for TREASON to show up in their criminal-record-histories for they are
under OATH and the King is supposed to be knowledgeable of the contents of said
Oath]» (followed by all of my «King's Directives» such as Ordering them to
bring out a Stenographer or to start Stenographing, and, all sorts of other
things to «Control the Court-Room» so-to-speak, get pertinent information
on-record, etc., etc., just know that, for anybody who is even thinking about
trying this out, I hope you have done your «homework» on «royal-society» and
«kingly duties» in order to know what kinds of «responsibilities» the «king»
has when he starts commanding a court-room)...

On 2022/04/24 18:38, Baird Fairbairn wrote:

I appreciate all the articles you guys send.   I do have a question for you
guys. I went to court last week to ditch this bar "defender" to do the work
needed on my case.        The judge explained that I would need to do my Psych
evaluations that the public "defender" suggested in her motion 11(the only
movement from defense on this case) since December.         I have been trying
to get her to file motions and submit my status paperwork to establish
standing. She refused her last excuse was let's see what happens at the psych
evaluations and court in May which if not for the rule 11 motion she filed
would be the end of the rope.due to my right to a speedy trial. But now her
advice is wait to see what happens at the psych evals/courtdate. psych evals
are tomorrow and Tuesday.            I can't help to wonder why they are so
hell bent on these psych evaluations. Anyone of the times I actually chose to
speak nobody in the right mind could assume I was inept. Should I just stop
playing their games and stop jumping through hoops obtain the gsa bonds ? I'm
fully aware of the fraudulent  proceedings that take place at the court house.
      I have recieved my passport filing as a national. I've filed the ucc1,
amended and ucc3. And filed the common law copyright with the county. Notified
the attorney general, the state Attorney and all parties of my status change.
Please let me know I'm at the point now that I'm done playing their games.
                        Baird concerned American       On Fri, Apr 22, 2022,
9:19 AM dr.richard.cordero_esq <dmarc-noreply-outsider@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

NOTES: I would be grateful if you would acknowledge receipt of this email.
                                                You are encouraged to share and
post it to social media as widely as possible in your own interest and that of
the rest of We the People; e.g., click “Reply All” and send.                To
subscribe to articles similar to the one hereunder go to
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org ;<left panel ↓Register;    or    + New
or  Users  >Add New; or fill out the New User form at
https://www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/wp-admin/user-new.php .
  The article below had a consistent format when sent. If it shows
irregularities when received, they crept in during transit and are beyond my
control. Kindly overlook them. A pdf version of this article -as such likely to
be free of irregularities- is found here and downloadable through the next
link.   Advocates of Honest Judiciaries
thinking critically and taking action
at the most propitious time
to persuade journalists to investigate judges' abuse of power; and
to set in motion a national, single issue, civic movement for
judicial abuse exposure, compensation of abusees, and reform
By

Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School
D.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris
Judicial Discipline Reform
New York City
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx , ;
DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx , CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx     Dear
Advocates of Honest Judiciaries,   Thank you for your emails.    A. The need to
take action now   1. I appreciate your sharing my article with others by
clicking “Reply All” and “Send”. Although you may receive the same article
repeatedly, by so doing you are sharing it with different blocs of addressees
in the To: box.     2. We need people who take action at this most propitious
time for exposing judges’ abuse of power and financial criminality, as
explained hereunder.     3. Indeed, we are all united by our commitment to
attaining one common objective: to expose judges’ abuse and criminality and
obtain compensation for the harm that judges have caused us.     4. That
commitment requires effort to read, reread, and read again the below article
until you understand the out-of-court strategy to inform and outrage the
national public so that it demands that journalists and primarying politicians
expose judges and hold them accountable and liable to compensate the victims of
their abuse and criminality.

a. Here applies the axiom of strategic thinking, "Those who cannot do the
least cannot do more". Those who cannot read even an article written for their
benefit will keep roboticly seeking their remedy alone in court only to be
further abused by judges...and will keep whining about it.
     5. The required effort includes sharing this article and my other ones by
clicking "Reply All" and "Send"; and posting it to social media, such as:
Facebook,   Youtube,   LinkedIn,   Instagram,   Google Plus,   Pinterest,
Reddit,   Snapchat,   WhatsAp   Tweet: Tell journalists and politicians your
story of judges' abuse of power to participate in unprecedented citizens
hearings and demand compensation and reform;
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_your_story_for_media&citizens_hearings.pdf

   6. This group is not a law debating society. Nor a mutual commiseration
therapy group.     7. We are people committed to implementing the above-stated
out-of-court inform and outrage strategy by forming a national, single issue,
civic movement for judicial abuse of power exposure, compensation of abusees,
and reform.     8. If you are truly committed to the effort of informing and
outraging the national public, let nothing derail you from its pursuit. When
you receive an email that is off subject, uninformative, or otherwise
inappropriate, politely let the sender know…or simply click delete, which is
what I do to any email that uses foul language, for that is totally
unacceptable. We will not let the bad and unprofessional behavior of some
people justify judges' dismissal of pro ses and all other Advocates of Honest
Judiciaries as 'a bunch of disgruntled losers'. Far from it, we want the
national public, journalists, and primarying politicians recognize and look up
to us as Champions of Justice.
     9. If you ask me to remove you from my emailing list because you are
receiving too many and unhelpful emails, that means that the effort to click
"Delete" is more harmful to you than all the abuse that you allegedly suffered
or are suffering at the hands of judges. Lucky for you, you have not been and
are not being abused at all.     10. Take action! Read, Share, Write and
realize…     B. The need to analyze with critical judgment everything we hear
or read   11. Your link, advocate Tak, characterizes the complaint filed by a
neighbor of Ardee as “baseless”. Understandably, that upset you given that it
led to Ardee’s 72-hour commitment to a psychiatric ward.     12. Now you have
to use critical judgment to analyze that link, never mind the article
downloaded through it.      13. You cannot simply jump to the conclusion,
perhaps in line with your experience, that the complaint was “baseless” just
because it was so characterized by somebody somewhere. That would only show
bias toward believing anything that was negative about ‘the system’ or ‘the
police’ or ‘social services’.      14. You always need to be critical even when
the information that you receive supports your beliefs.     15. Hence, ask
yourself:      a. Who wrote that article?      b. How much do they have to lose
or gain by stating something sensationalist?      c. Do they make money
depending on how many times people view their articles and click their
advertisement spots?      d. Do they work for a reputable publisher worth suing
for defamation for making incorrect statements, a risk that increases its
interest in ensuring that all its statements are correct?     e. Or do they
work for a no-name start-up digital publisher that can hardly pay for its
Internet connection so it is only interested in increasing itsnumber of
clickers even if they are a full fool follower complement?     16. The
complaint was filed by “a neighbor”. So ask yourself:      a. How many times
before had that neighbor complained about Ardee?      b. What was the nature of
those complaints?      c. Was there violence or threats to someone’s or the
public’s safety?      d. If Ardee had been harmed because none of his/her
neighbors cared enough to abide by the public safety instruction, “If you see
something, say something”, would you blame the neighbors for their crass
self-centeredness and culpable indifference?      e. If your neighbors did not
bother to alert the authorities when they had reason to believe that you were
in danger, would you feel safer or so much lonelier and abandoned?     17. You
need to be critical at all times…because there is ALWAYS only six feet away
from you the attorney for the opposing party, who is paying attention to every
word that you say and do not say and is taking notes. And when it is her turn,
she will cross-examine you.      18. And if you were never critical of what you
heard or read and simply used it if it comforted your prejudices, that is, your
previous judgments, that opposing counsel will tear you to pieces on the stand
in front of the jury and the journalists in the audience in court and out of
court via video conference! And you will have let all of us down.      19. And
when you step down from the witness stand and walk to your seat you are going
to feel so very small, humiliated, and dissatisfied with yourself because you
failed to think critically: You could and should have asked yourself those
questions.      20. That is why you are going to think critically! So, on the
stand you will earn the respect and the attention of everybody, including the
judge, all of us, and the national public because everybody realizes that you
are a responsible, fair, and thoughtful person. You meet the legal standard of
“a reasonable, impartial observer who proceeded responsibly under the
circumstances to inform herself of the facts”.     21. Help us become like you.
Set the right example. Teach pro ses to think critically so that we all earn
public respect and support.
1. An exercise in thinking critically

  22. Practice analyzing the subject line of this email:    Re: What did Judge
Ketanji Brown Jackson and Justice Thomas know about judges’ abuse of power and
when did they know it?   23. Does that subject line show that I am racist
because I make reference to Judge Jackson and Justice Thomas given that they
are the two most talked-about jurists at the moment, and they happen to be
Black, or does it show that I want journalists and politicians to cross-examine
them to expose the ‘abuse of power by judges’, who include all those judges who
are white, yellow, brown, male, female, Christian, Muslim, Hispanic, whatever!?
    24. “Judges” are the ones that my subject line criticizes for abusing
power, not the two named jurists who knew about it or should have known had
they proceeded with due diligence to safeguard the integrity of judicial
process. The questions that the subject line implicitly asks of them are:
a. What did they do based on that knowledge or do they lack any knowledge
because they engaged in willful blindness and willful ignorance?(jur:90§§b-c)
  b. Did they use their knowledge or their means of gaining it to ensure the
integrity of judicial process or did they disregard it to cover up for their
“brothers and sisters of the robe” and avoid being treated as their traitors?
     c. Have they shown enough respect for judicial integrity to remain on the
bench or should their complicit conduct cause such outrage out of court in an
informed public as to deprive them of public trust, thus requiring that they
resign…together with the abusive judges that they covered up for?   25. It is
imperative for Advocates, including all pro ses, to think critically at every
step of the way toward forming a movement for judicial exposure of judges'
abuse, compensation, and reform, so that they may be recognized and followed by
the national public as its Champions of Justice.
   C. Every meaningful cause needs resources for its advancement;
     none can be continued, let alone advanced, without money   26. Lip service
advances nothing; but it continues to enable the abusers.     27. Put your
money where your outrage at abuse and quest for justice are.     28. Support
the professional law research and writing, and strategic thinking at:
Judicial Discipline Reform http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org   DONATE   ;
by making a deposit or an online transfer through either the Bill Pay feature
of your online account or Zelle    from your account   to TD Bank account # 43
92 62 52 45, routing # 260 13 673;   or Citi Bank account # 4977 59 2001,
routing # 021 000 089.     Dare trigger history!...and you may enter it.
Sincerely,   Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Judicial Discipline Reform
2165 Bruckner Blvd
Bronx, New York City 10472-6506
    tel. +1(718)827-9521
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx, DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ,
CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx
https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-richard-cordero-esq-0508ba4b   NOTE: Given the ;
interference with Dr. Cordero’s email and e-cloud storage accounts described at
*>ggl:1 et seq. and † >OL2:1114§G, when emailing him, copy the above bloc of
his email addresses and paste it in the To: line of your email so as to enhance
the chances of your email reaching him at least at one of those addresses.
   *******************************

    NOTES: I would be grateful if you would acknowledge receipt of this email.

                                                       You are encouraged to
share and post it to social media as widely as possible in your own interest
and that of the rest of We the People; e.g., click “Reply All” and send.
       To subscribe to articles similar to the one hereunder go to
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org ;<left panel ↓Register   or   + New
or   Users   >Add New.                The article below had a consistent format
when sent. If it shows irregularities when received, they crept in during
transit and are beyond my control. Kindly overlook them. A pdf version of this
article -as such likely to be free of irregularities- is found here and
downloadable through the next link.
    Journalists interested in a scoop and a Pulitzer Prize;
primarying politicians; and
those outraged by The Wall Street Journal finding in only a sample of cases
that
“131 Federal Judges Broke the Law by Hearing Cases Where They Had a Financial
Interest”,
yet they have been
neither investigated by either their Federal Judiciary or former chief judge
now Attorney General Merrick Garland, nor required to disgorge the gains that
they grabbed, can use the official statistics of his and J. Ketanji Brown
Jackson’s District of Columbia Circuit
to show their participation in a cover-up
concerning their peers' law-breaking and other forms of abuse of power, and
effected by
dismissing 100% of complaints against their peers and
denying 100% of petitions to review those dismissals,
thus revealing their lack of courage to expose their peers’ abuse and
interest
in not being shunned as traitors but rather
in being accepted by their "brothers and sisters of the robe"
at the expense of the complainants and
the integrity of the system of justice, left to fester with
the underlying and untreated cause for complaint:
judges emboldened by reciprocally ensuring the risklessness of their abuse

http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-journalists_politicians_scooping_judges_racketeering.pdf

By
Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School
D.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris
Judicial Discipline Reform
New York City
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx , ;
DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx , CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx
Dear Journalists, Politicians, and Advocates of Honest Judiciaries,
  1.  Justice nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson was confirmed by the Senate on
April 7, 2022. However, she will not take her seat on the Supreme Court until
the end of this term in the summer. This affords a unique opportunity to
journalists, including the media outlets for which they work, who want to make
a scoop that can lead to their winning a Pulitzer Prize; principled and
opportunistic primarying politicians; and people interested in the integrity of
the judiciary:

a. They can examine the integrity and character of J. Brown Jackson and of
former chief judge now Attorney General (AG) Merrick Garland in light of the
official reports and statistics of their District of Columbia Circuit. There
she sat as a trial judge from 2013 to 2021, and has sat as an appellate judge
of the Court of Appeals for that Circuit(CADCC) since June 2021; and he served
as that Court's chief judge from 2013 to 2020.

  b. It follows that the comments made here referring to J. Brown apply even
more forcefully to Now-AG and Then-Judge and even Chief Judge Garland, as they
do to Justice Clarence Thomas. Hence, such application is not made explicit in
every instance.
A. The official statistics on complaints against judges

2. Those reports and statistics are submitted by the 13 U.S. courts of
appeals, including CADCC, and 2 national courts to Congress as a public
document in the Annual Report of the Director of the Administrative Office of
the U.S. Courts. The director is appointed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme
Court under Title 28 of the U.S. Code [of federal law only] section 601(28
U.S.C. §601).

3. Complaints against judges of a circuit can be filed by any person,
including a judge, under the Judicial Conduct and Disability Act of 1980(the
Act; id. §§351-364). The complaint statistics have appeared for most of those
years in Table S-22 of the Annual Report. I have compiled and tabulated them
for ease of presentation and analysis. Those statistics show that for decades,
federal judges have dismissed 100% of complaints against their peers and denied
100% of petitions to review those dismissals.
4. Indeed, the introduction to Table S-22 for 2021 states the following
concerning complaint

References:

[administrating-your-public-servants] Re: Taking action and thinking critically to cause journalists and politicians to read your story and ask: What did Judge K Brown Jack

Other related posts: