got it
This is private email message and any attachment(s) is covered by the
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2410-2521, and is for the sole
use of the intended recipient. Third parties, by reading this email you enter
into binding contract between you and me, one of the People of Posterity. All
agents or informants working to monitor My email(s) and any other means of
communication without My express written permission, are barred from any use,
disclosure, or distribution. I reserve all My rights without prejudice
including all intellectual property rights. If you read any of the contents of
My E-Mails, you agree to pay a user fee of $325,000.00 US payable in gold or
silver coin, per hour or any fraction thereof, tracked by your IP address. If
you copy any of my posts, you agree to pay a user fee of $125,000.00US per use.
Your use is binding contract to pay. All user fees are immediately due and
payable upon use.
On Sunday, September 11, 2022, 12:23:16 PM EDT, dr.richard.cordero_esq
<dmarc-noreply-outsider@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
NOTES: I would be grateful if you would acknowledge receipt of this email.
You are encouraged to share and post it to social media as widely
as possible in your own interest and that of the rest of We the People; e.g.,
click “Reply All” and “Send”.
To subscribe to emails similar to the one hereunder go to
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org <left panel ↓Register or + New
or Users >Add New; or fill out the New User form at
https://www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/wp-admin/user-new.php.
The email below had a consistent format when sent. If it shows
irregularities when received, e.g., joinedwords or different font sizes, they
crept in during transit and are beyond my control. Kindly overlook them. A pdf
version of this email -as such likely to be free of irregularities- is found
here and downloadable through the next link. Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School
D.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris
Judicial Discipline Reform
New York City
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.orgDr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx,
DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx
Dear Mr. Davis, Ms. Mo, and Advocates of Honest Judiciaries,‡
Thank you for your emails.
A. Application in state and federal courts and in civil and criminal cases
1. Federal law is applicable nationwide.
2. In state courts, it can be applied whenever a case does not meet the
requirements for filing in federal court, e.g.:
a. the case does not meet the minimum amount in controversy, which is $75,000,
as provided for under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a); or
b. diversity of jurisdiction -one party is a citizen of the state where the
court sits and the other party is not- is defeated by the addition of a state
party to the out-of-state party.
3. The principles of recusal due to the probability of a judge's bias are
applicable in civil and criminal cases, for they go to the essence of due
process, whose application in every judicial process is required by the 14th
Amendment, Section 1, of the U.S. Constitution.
4. I respectfully encourage you to share my articles by simply clicking "Reply
All" and "Send". While the subject line of the emails that you receive from me
may be the same, each email has a different set of email addresses in the To:
box.
B. Cases holding that judges can be held accountable and liable
5. Kindly have your lawyer review Strickland v. U.S., where the plaintiff, Ms.
Strickland, had all the judges, that is, "the bench", of the Court of Appeals
for the Fourth Circuit recuse themselves.
a. Moreover, plaintiff Strickland sued the United States and the Judicial
Conference of the U.S, the highest policy-making body of the Federal Judiciary,
which holds its twice a year meetings behind closed doors and never holds a
press conference. It is presided over by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court
and includes all the chief judges of the 13 circuits and the two national
courts as well as representative federal district and bankruptcy judges.
b. In addition, plaintiff Strickland sued the Administrative Office of the U.S.
Courts (AO), which provides administrative services to all the federal courts
through its 20 committees, all composed of judges appointed by the Chief
Justice, as are the AO director and deputy director.
c. Plaintiff Strickland also sued judges, AO, and judicial circuit officers in
their official and individual capacities.
6. A PA state courtordered judges who sent juveniles to government
paid/privately run detentionfacilities in exchange for kickbacks to pay victims
$206 million in compensatory and punitive damages.
7. See also:
a. Brooklyn Beats Crime By Cleaning Record Tied To Dirty Cops: All of this
could have been prevented if they just made the cops pinky swear not to plant
evidence; Chris Williams; Above the Law; September 9, 2022;
cwilliams@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; b. Brooklyn district attorney [Eric Gonzalez] moves
to dismiss nearly 400 convictions tied to dirty NYPD cops; John Annese; New
York Daily News; September 7, 2022.
8. A question that your lawyer should consider is whether without going through
all the appellate stages to the state supreme court, as is normally required,
the Florida judges and their judiciary can be sued in federal court:
a. on the basis of "probable bias" of Florida judges in favor of their state
colleagues and their own judiciary, which denies the fundamental element of due
process, that is, a fair and impartial tribunal;
1) The Supreme Court has indicated that recusaldoes not require proof of actual
bias, but rather a showing of circumstances“in which experience teaches that
the probability of actual bias on thepart of the judge or decision-maker is too
high to be constitutionallytolerable.” Withrow v. Larkin, 421 U.S. 35,
47(1975). (emphasis added)
2) In Caperton v. Massey, slip opinion, 556 U. S. __(2009),the Supreme Court
“stressed that it was not required to decide whether in fact[the judge] was
influenced [by one of the litigants]. The proper constitutionalinquiry is
whether sitting on the case then before [him] would offer a possibletemptation
to the average judge to lead him not to hold the balance nice, clearand true.
[Where] the probability of actual bias rises to anunconstitutional level
[recusal is required].” (internal quotations omitted; Caperton,pages 8-9, 16)
“Circumstances and relationships must be considered.” (id., 10);(emphasis
added).
b. on an application by analogy of the principles underlying diversity of
citizenship, which allows a suit to be filed in, or removed to, federal court
where an out-of-state party sues, or is sued by, a state party and it is
necessary to avoid the possibility of bias by a state court in favor of the
state party.
C. Share the product of professional legal research and writing and strategic
thinking
9. I respectfully encourage you, Ms. Mo., to share this email and the proposal
below with your lawyer and have him/her share with me the motion filed in your
case.
10. Share my articles widely by simply clicking "Reply All" and"Send". While
the subject line of the emails that you receive from memay be the same, each
email has a different set of email addresses in the To:box.
11. Share my offer of a presentation by emailing it as well as posting it to
social media, such as:
Facebook, Youtube, LinkedIn, Instagram, Google Plus, Pinterest,
Reddit, Snapchat, WhatsApp Twitter: Proposal to professors & students of
a Zoom/live presentationon a series of steps to expose judges' abuse of power,
demand compensation, andbecome the watchdogs of the judicial system;
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_presentation_to_professors&students.pdf.
D. Every meaningful cause needs resources for its advancement;
none can be continued, let alone advanced, without money
12. Put your money where your outrage at abuse and quest for justice are. 13.
Support the professional law research and writing, and strategic thinking at
Judicial Discipline Reform
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org. DONATEby making a deposit or an ;
online transfer through either the Bill Pay feature of your online account or
Zelle from your account
to TD Bank account # 43 92 62 52 45, routing # 260 13 673;
or Citi Bank account # 4977 59 2001, routing # 021 000 089.
14. I look forward to hearing from you, your lawyers, and Advocates.
Dare trigger history!...and you may enter it.
Sincerely,
Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Judicial Discipline Reform
2165 Bruckner Blvd
Bronx, New York City 10472-6506
tel. +1(718)827-9521
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx, DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx
******************************
NOTES: I would be grateful if you would acknowledge receipt of this email.
Youare encouraged to share and post it to social media as widely
as possible inyour own interest and that of the rest of We the People; e.g.,
click “ReplyAll” and “Send”.
Tosubscribe to emails similar to the one hereunder go to
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org<left panel ↓Register or + New or
Users >Add New;or fill out the New User form at
https://www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/wp-admin/user-new.php.
Theemail below had a consistent format when sent. If it shows
irregularities whenreceived, e.g., joinedwords or different font sizes, they
crept in duringtransit and are beyond my control. Kindly overlook them. A pdf
version of this email-as such likely to be free of irregularities- is found
here and downloadablethrough the next link.
Proposal to law and journalism professors, peers, and students
to expose judges' corruption and abuse of power
through a series of steps leading up to
transformative change in their own and their schools' role in society
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_presentation_ ;
to_professors&students.pdf
By Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School
D.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris
Judicial Discipline Reform
New York City
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.orgDr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx,
DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx
The dean of the lawschool, the dean of students, and the clinical law
professors, and intheir care to all other professors and the officers of the
student class andother appropriate organizations The law school Dear Deans,
Professors, and Officers, 1. This is a proposal for a presentation on how
through a series of steps and apublic interest clinic you all can counterthe
problems besieging law schools: dwindling enrollment,imperiled financial
viability, and diminishing chances of finding a law jobupon graduation. It is
based on precedent.
a. In the civilsuit Strickland v.U.S., the Court of Appeals for the Fourth
Circuit held last April 26that the Federal Judiciary and its officers,
including judges, can onconstitutional grounds be sued and held liable in their
official and individualcapacities.3
b. 90 gymnasts sued the FBI and agents for over $1 billion last June 8, for its
failure to act on the complaints against sexual predator Dr. Larry Nassar
brought toFBI agents and the FBI’s cover-up of their dereliction of duty.
c. A PA state court ordered judges who sent juveniles to
governmentpaid/privately run detention facilities in exchange for kickbacks to
payvictims $206 millionin compensatory and punitive damages.
2. The most recent and indisputableevidence of unaccountable judges’ abuse of
power is found in the series of articles that The Wall Street Journal beganto
publish on September 28, 2021, under the initial title “[now 152] Federal
Judges Broke the Law byHearing Cases Where They Had a Financial Interest”.
a. At last count, 58 of those judgeshad instructed their clerks of court to
notify the parties tothose cases that those judges should have recused
themselves then, have done sonow, and new judges will be assigned totheir
cases.
b. However, to date,not a single of those judges has been
investigated,subjected to disciplinary measures, let alone referred for
impeachment, orforced to disgorge the gains that they made byresolving in their
favor their conflict of interests.
3. The presentation will center onthree ongoing cases that can be further
prosecuted through the device that cangain the highest payoff for law schools
and compensate the largestnumber of victims: class actions including RICO
charges. They canprovoke national outrage; open the floodgates of motions that
create aniche practice for law students; and lead schools to hold citizens
hearings thattransform their role into We thePeople’s watchdog on unaccountable
judges and their judiciaries.
a. A person in an official capacity acquired knowledgefirsthand about
prosecutors, NYPD officers and detectives, and judges of a NYcriminal court
colluding to obtain an indictment against people charged withmurder even though
their ‘supporting evidence’ revealed that no crime had evenoccurred.
1) A complaint was filed with the NYPDInternal Affairs Bureau (IAB) requesting
that it investigate its members’participation in such wrongdoing. Its handling
by over a dozen officers forthree months indicates that IAB has coordinated a
cover-up. A complaint againstit has been escalated to NYPDCommissioner Keechant
Sewell.
2) The class action plaintiffs will bethousands of people who have been and
still are charged and/or prosecuted onfalse indictments and incarcerated. The
defendants will be the wrongdoers andthe administrative judges, elected
officers, public defenders, and their institutionschargeable with derelictionof
duty for failing to investigate.
b. Medicareadministers a budget of $100s of billion for the benefit of its more
than 33million insureds. It works with hundreds of HMOs and other health
insuranceentities. They have common interests: pay the fewest claims and
attract to, andmaintain in their, networks the largest number of medical
services provider.
1) To advance their interests theydeny and uphold the denial of as many of
their insureds’ claims as possible;disregard the legal obligation to accept as
total payment Medicare’s schedulesof fees for services; and condone the billing
of insureds for the unpaid balance.
2) The majority of insureds who appealdenials and balance billing appear pro
se. Due to their ignorance of the law,they are abused. The recovery can be huge
and force transformative change.
c. Federal judges intercept people’s emails and mail to detect and
suppressthose of their critics. They thus deprive the People of their
mostcherished rights, i.e., those guaranteed by the 1st Amendment to “freedom
of speech, of the press,the right of the people peaceably to assemble [on the
Internet], and topetition the Government for a redress of grievances [e.g.,
compensation]”.
1) See the proposal for a forensic examination by Information Technologyexperts
of the computers of critics of judges;cf. former CBS reporter Sharyl Attkisson
in her suit againstDoJ.
4. This proposal and its link -in the tweet next- can be shared widely;
distributedat the student organizations fair at the start of the academic year,
and postedto social media, such as:
Facebook, Youtube, LinkedIn, Instagram, Google Plus, Pinterest,
Reddit, Snapchat, WhatsApp
Twitter: Proposal to professors & students of a Zoom/live presentation on a
series of steps to expose judges' abuse of power, demand compensation, and
become the watchdogs of the judicial system;
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_presentation_to_professors&students.pdf.
5. The proposal is supported by my professional law research andwriting, and
strategic thinking; they under-gird the production of athree-volume study of
judges and their judiciaries titledthus:
Exposing Judges' Unaccountability and
Consequent Riskless Abuse of Power:
Pioneering the news and publishing field of
judicial unaccountability reporting* † ♣
♣Volume 3:
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL3/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates3.pdf ;
fromOL3:1144-1492+
