I deeply appreciate the value that your are freely providing. I’ll surely
forward this as I know someone who is currently litigating a issue. Can
this be used in California and how does this work towards criminal cases?
On Sat, Sep 10, 2022 at 12:04 PM dr.richard.cordero_esq <
dmarc-noreply-outsider@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
*NOTES*: I would be grateful if you would acknowledge receipt of thisAll rights reserved without prejudice;
email.
You are encouraged to share and post it to social media as
widely as possible in your own interest and that of the rest of *We the
People*; e.g., click “*Reply All*” and “*Send*”.
To subscribe to emails similar to the one hereunder go to
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org
<http://www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/> <left panel ↓Register
or + New or Users >Add New; or fill out the New User form at
https://www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/wp-admin/user-new.php.
The email below had a consistent format when sent. If it
shows irregularities when received, e.g., joinedwords or different font
sizes, they crept in during transit and are beyond my control. Kindly
overlook them. A pdf version of this email -as such likely to be free of
irregularities- is found here
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_from_abortion_decision_to_new_constitution.pdf>
and
downloadable through the next link.
*Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.*Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School
D.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris
*Judicial Discipline Reform*
New York City
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org
<http://www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/>
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx, DrRCordero@
Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org, CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx
Dear Ms. Mo and Advocates of Honest Judiciaries,‡
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-ProfSRoseAckerman_ProfJSGersen.pdf>
Thank you, Ms. Mo, for your email.
Kindly have your lawyer review *Strickland v. U.S.*
<https://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinions/211346.p.pdf>, where the
plaintiff, Ms. Strickland, had all the judges, that is, "the bench", of the
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit <https://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/> recuse
themselves.
Moreover, plaintiff Strickland sued the United States and the Judicial
Conference of the U.S, the highest policy-making body of the Federal
Judiciary, which holds its twice a year meetings behind closed doors and
never holds a press conference. It is presided over by the Chief Justice of
the Supreme Court and includes all the chief judges of the 13 circuits and
the two national courts as well as representative federal district and
bankruptcy judges.
In addition, plaintiff Strickland sued the Administrative Office of the
U.S. Courts (AO), which provides administrative services to all the federal
courts through its 20 committees, all composed of judges appointed by the
Chief Justice, as are the AO director and deputy director.
Plaintiff Strickland also sued judges, AO, and judicial circuit officers
in their official and individual capacities.
A PA state court ordered judges who sent juveniles to government
paid/privately run detention facilities in exchange for kickbacks to pay
victims $206 million
<https://www.abajournal.com/web/article/ex-judges-ordered-to-pay-more-than-200m-to-victims-of-juvenile-detention-corruption-scheme?utm_medium=email&utm_source=salesforce_569848&sc_sid=03050232&utm_campaign=weekly_email&promo=&utm_content=&additional4=&additional5=&sfmc_j=569848&sfmc_s=51600549&sfmc_l=1527&sfmc_jb=27008&sfmc_mid=100027443&sfmc_u=16628812>
in compensatory and punitive damages.
A question that your lawyer should consider is whether without going
through all the appellate stages to the state supreme court, as is normally
required, the Florida judges and their judiciary can be sued in federal
court:
a. on the basis of "probable bias" of Florida judges in favor of their
state colleagues and their own judiciary, which denies the fundamental
element of due process, that is, a fair and impartial tribunal;
1) The Supreme Court has indicated that recusal does not require proof of
actual bias, but rather a showing of circumstances “in which experience
teaches that the *probability* of actual bias on the part of the judge or
decision-maker is too high to be constitutionally tolerable.” *Withrow v.
Larkin*, 421 U.S. 35, 47 (1975). (emphasis added)
2) In *Caperton v. Massey*, slip opinion
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/docs/Caperton_v_Massey.pdf>, 556
U. S. __(2009), the Supreme Court “stressed that it was not required to
decide whether in fact [the judge] was influenced [by one of the
litigants]. The proper constitutional inquiry is whether sitting on the
case then before [him] would offer a possible temptation to the average
judge to lead him not to hold the balance nice, clear and true. [Where] the
*probability* of actual bias rises to an unconstitutional level [recusal
is required].” (internal quotations omitted; *Caperton*, pages 8-9, 16)
“Circumstances and relationships must be considered.” (id., 10); (emphasis
added).
b. on an application by analogy of the principles underlying diversity of
citizenship, which allows a suit to be filed in, or removed to, federal
court where an out-of-state party sues, or is sued by, a state party and it
is necessary to avoid the possibility of bias by a state court in favor of
the state party.
See also:
c. Brooklyn Beats Crime By Cleaning Record Tied To Dirty Cops
<https://abovethelaw.com/2022/09/brooklyn-beats-crime-by-cleaning-records-tied-to-dirty-cops/?utm_campaign=Above%20the%20Law%20Daily&utm_medium=email&_hsmi=225600918&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-91kbIujBI4SznApKrsT8L9WY_g__WauWM3ww9P4iqycEN1m7Td1AadOFNKf1nlmzyHa5uN7c5b-wyshySR4zvERg4EyX0VXLj302peNEoV1qRBYD4&utm_content=225600918&utm_source=hs_email>:
All of this could have been prevented if they just made the cops pinky
swear not to plant evidence; Chris Williams; Above the Law; September 9,
2022; cwilliams <cwilliams@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>@ <cwilliams@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
abovethelaw.com <cwilliams@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
d. Brooklyn district attorney [Eric Gonzalez
<https://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/nyc-crime/ny-brooklyn-da-vacates-convictions-connected-dirty-nypd-cops-20220907-yzwivnjhxfe6hjsdrbulzrwefe-story.html>]
moves to dismiss nearly 400 convictions tied to dirty NYPD cops; John
Annese; New York Daily News; September 7, 2022.
Please, share this email and the article below with your lawyer and have
him/her share with me the motion filed in your case.
Share with your lawyer and all other Advocates my offer of a presentation
at http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_
*presentation_to_professors&students*.pdf
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_presentation_to_professors&students.pdf>
.
I look forward to hearing from you, your lawyers, and Advocates.
Sincerely,
Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Judicial Discipline Reform
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.judicial-2Ddiscipline-2Dreform.org_&d=DwMFaQ&c=KBNavS4imt6liQAiYrIso_AWHVuxKUh5t9r9Wck8xQk&r=50B-KffMSsaX6S1639oPqcohgLDdniB88fxG3m3CZIU&m=BgoHxdKozSfUodhcVt3JC-Y6SmMxTr6_rb7-rmFtmfngGhZJgILhz4nZCSOxAvt0&s=MDmhz11e_XkhXqs_4X2H_9g7YGY3gCWmA0UdR16JBGg&e=>
2165 Bruckner Blvd
<https://www.google.com/maps/search/2165+Bruckner+Blvd+Bronx,+New+York+City+10472-6506?entry=gmail&source=g>
Bronx, New York City 10472-6506
<https://www.google.com/maps/search/2165+Bruckner+Blvd+Bronx,+New+York+City+10472-6506?entry=gmail&source=g>
tel. +1(718)827-9521
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx, DrRCordero@
Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__judicial-2Ddiscipline-2Dreform.org_&d=DwMFaQ&c=KBNavS4imt6liQAiYrIso_AWHVuxKUh5t9r9Wck8xQk&r=50B-KffMSsaX6S1639oPqcohgLDdniB88fxG3m3CZIU&m=BgoHxdKozSfUodhcVt3JC-Y6SmMxTr6_rb7-rmFtmfngGhZJgILhz4nZCSOxAvt0&s=zKxutG6n-C7Lczoe95YOb3rHWnthlQU0W9N3dPFvUFs&e=>,
CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__yahoo.com_&d=DwMFaQ&c=KBNavS4imt6liQAiYrIso_AWHVuxKUh5t9r9Wck8xQk&r=50B-KffMSsaX6S1639oPqcohgLDdniB88fxG3m3CZIU&m=BgoHxdKozSfUodhcVt3JC-Y6SmMxTr6_rb7-rmFtmfngGhZJgILhz4nZCSOxAvt0&s=5D1y8ZQdehqiSzI90NVIh0ylLNiYxO4GbXLJURDxSvk&e=>
******************************
*NOTES*: I would be grateful if you would acknowledge receipt of this
email.
You are encouraged to share and post it to social media as
widely as possible in your own interest and that of the rest of *We the
People*; e.g., click “*Reply All*” and “*Send*”.
To subscribe to emails similar to the one hereunder go to
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org
<http://www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/> <left panel ↓Register
or + New or Users >Add New; or fill out the New User form at
https://www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/wp-admin/user-new.php.
The email below had a consistent format when sent. If it
shows irregularities when received, e.g., joinedwords or different font
sizes, they crept in during transit and are beyond my control. Kindly
overlook them. A pdf version of this email -as such likely to be free of
irregularities- is found here
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_from_abortion_decision_to_new_constitution.pdf>
and downloadable through the next link.
*Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq. *Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School
D.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris
*Judicial Discipline Reform*
New York City
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org
<http://www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/>
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx, DrRCordero@
Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org, CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx
Professor Susan Rose-Ackerman
Yale Law School
susan.rose-ackerman@xxxxxxxx
tel. (203)432-6769
Professor Jeannie Suk Gersen
Harvard Law School
jsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
tel. (617)496-5487
Dear Professor Rose-Ackerman, Prof. Rose-Ackerman, peers, and students,‡
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-ProfSRoseAckerman_ProfJSGersen.pdf>
1. I read with interest, Prof. Rose-Ackerman, your paper “Judicial
Independence and Corruption”.
2.Thanks to your arguing, Prof. Gersen, of *Strickland v. U.S.*
<https://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinions/211346.p.pdf>, the Court of
Appeals for the Fourth Circuit <https://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/> held last
April 26 that the Federal Judiciary itself and its officers, including
judges, can on constitutional and statutory grounds be sued and held liable
in their official and individual capacities.
3. This is a proposal to follow a series of five strategic steps to expose
judicial independence as unaccountability that allows judges’ riskless
corruption
and abuse of power for their gain and convenience. Those steps should
lead to a class action to compensate their victims. Yale and Harvard law
students can take the lead in that exposure as they did in the opposition
to the nomination of Then-Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court. The
action can be a teaching event, as shown infra.
4. The first step is for you and your students to invite me to present
the proposal by video conference or in person to you, them, and your peers.
You can preview it my article at♦
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_from_abortion_decision_to_new_constitution.pdf>
and on my website *Judicial Discipline Reform* at
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org
<http://www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/>. That site has attracted
countless webvisitors and turned into subscribers 44,763 of them as of
September 9, 2022.
5. They have been induced to subscribe by my professional law research and
writing, and strategic thinking. You all can assess the validity of that
statement by reviewing the foundation of my articles posted there, namely,
my three-volume study of judges and their judiciaries♣
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL3/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates3.pdf>
:
*Exposing Judges' Unaccountability and Consequent Riskless Abuse of Power:*
*Pioneering the news and publishing field of judicial unaccountability
reporting**
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf>
†
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates2.pdf>
♣
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL3/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates3.pdf>
6. That study collects and discusses abundant evidence(OL:194§E
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf>)
showing that judges individually and as a class through coordination engage
in corruption and abuse of power. The most recent and indisputable evidence
thereof is found in the series
<https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-the-journal-found-judges-violations-of-law-on-conflicts-11632833775?mod=Searchresults_pos11&page=1>
of
articles that *The Wall Street Journal *(*WSJ*) began to publish on
September 28, 2021, under the initial title “131 Federal Judges Broke the
Law by Hearing Cases Where They Had a Financial Interest”.
7. At last count, 58 of those judges had instructed their clerks of court
to notify the parties to those cases that those judges should have recused
themselves then, have done so now, and new judges will be assigned to their
cases.
8. The Federal Judiciary has not taken any disciplinary action against any
of those judges. Judges protect each other through their explicit or
implicit reciprocal cover-up agreement: ‘Today you protect me and
tomorrow I’ll protect you, for if you let them take me down, *I’ll bring
you with me!*’
9.This explains why no action is going to be taken by Attorney General
Merrick Garland given that he was a member, and for 7 years the chief
judge, of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Any
investigation of judges authorized by him even if he subsequently recused
himself would soon incriminate him as their accessory: He kept quite after
learning of their act of corruption and abuse, whereby his expected silence
enabled them before their next act; not to mention if he were exposed as a
principal.
10. So, it falls on law professors, students, and lawyers to muster the
courage and take the initiative to expose judges' misconduct and the
cover-up agreement that perpetuates it.
11. The second step envisages your and your students’ sharing this
proposal with the officers of the student class and associations that will
vie for new members during the fair of associations to be held at the
beginning of next academic year. Thus, time is of the essence.
12. It is also so because the public is getting ready to vote in the
midterm elections. It can hold accountable the politicians who nominated
and confirmed judicial candidates and since then protect them as ‘*our*
men and women on the bench’, their harm to others notwithstanding. Hence
the importance of turning into a key electoral issue judges’ corruption and
abuse of power and politicians’ condonation of them.
13. The third step aims to do that by professors and students holding
press conferences where they ask the media to join them in demanding that
President Biden release the secret reports that the FBI has submitted to
presidents after vetting judicial candidates by exercising, when needed,
its subpoena power. That demand will be justified by the need to answer
this question: What did the President and his predecessors know about the
candidates' corruption and abuse and when did they know it? Will they
claim that the reports were ‘accidentally erased during a system upgrade’,
as the Secret Service and Homeland Security have concerning emails related
to the January 6 Capitol assault?
14. The fourth step is the class action on behalf of judges’ victims. It
will be supported by a public informed and outraged by journalists pursuing
a scoop. It finds a strong precedent in the suit brought by 90 gymnasts
against the FBI and agents for over $1 billion
<https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/olympics/2022/06/08/larry-nassar-victims-fbi-lawsuit/>
last June 8, for its failure
<https://time.com/6185474/simone-biles-larry-nassar-lawsuit/>to act
<https://time.com/6185474/simone-biles-larry-nassar-lawsuit/> on the
complaints against sexual predator Dr. Larry Nassar brought to FBI agents
and the FBI’s cover-up of their dereliction of duty.
15. In the same vein of suing even top government officers, seven Capitol
Police officers have sued former President Trump
<https://www.politico.com/news/2021/08/26/capitol-police-suing-trump-506944>
and the organizers of the rally at the Ellipse where he held the inflaming
speech that preceded the January 6 assault on the Capitol.
16. The above are manifestations of the strongest support for the class
action, to wit, the national mood of intolerance of any form of abuse.
Indeed, the public has grown increasingly determined to hold public figures
and officers accountable and liable to compensate their victims since the
eruption of the *MeToo!* and BLM movements; the protests against police
brutality, socio-economic inequalities, and the Supreme Court's reversal of
*Roe
v. Wade*; the public hearings of the House January 6 Committee and the
lip service assurance by A.G. Garland that "nobody is above the law" so
that the Department of Justice will prosecute all Capitol assault
organizers and participants.
17. The class action will generate a flood of motions to vacate, remand,
and for new trials; for the reimbursement by recused judges of the cost of
judicial process that they rendered useless and of disentangling contracts
based on their now void or voidable decisions; and for actions against
state judges and judiciaries. They will create a much-needed niche
practice for you and your students.
18. Judges' and their judiciaries' conduct constitutes a pattern of
racketeering that warrants bringing a count against them under federal
and/or state civil RICO (18 U.S.C. §1961
<https://uscode.house.gov/download/download.shtml>). Such statutes
provide the injured party "shall recover threefold the damages he
sustains and the cost of the suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee" (
--
