Charley, where does the Northwest Ordinance apply? Does it apply in all
the fifty republics or just those in the actual territory described in the
Ordinance? I live in the Southwest not the Northwest. Is this
Ordinance still applicable to me and can I refer to it when demanding to be
treated as a man and not property?
On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 7:36 PM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Don Mashak
Who are you? First one must cleanse their mind. Organic law is:
Declaration of Independence, Articles of Confederation and Northwest
Ordinance and The Constitution of the United States. As a free will
individual and one created the constution. They did not surrender these
documents by the constitution. They created two laws. Article 6 section 1 &
2. That article recognizes your relationship with those documents. Article
1, section 8, clause 17 states your not United States property or citizen.
Unless they own you. They do not own me. So who am I? I'm a free person who
over threw the Britain reign. I'm one who created the other organic law
documents. Or my forefathers did.
That is why article 6;1&2 is important because it states there is two
laws. One is here and one was previous to this contract. Some here state
two nations or two constitutions and true. Article 1;8;17 shows the
limitation of the United States and I'm not their slave. That is ones
hardest battle to prove. Jurisdicton. Once done you have jurisdicton,
authority, right to create orders. The judge is your servant and
administrator. Any use of codes and court cases allows the judge to bring
into your case all sorts of their codes. The reason I do not read most
posts here because I know you have a high chance of losing. The only reason
to use codes is because you do not know who you are. Northwest Ordinance
Section 14 article 2 states the law in that jurisdiction in few sentences.
Use Avalon project for original documents on this matter.
So I never looked for a code because that is United States codes and
statues and I do not need that to know who I am. If you do your an infant
and need their assistance/code. The Con artists love you to think liberty
can be found in there legislation.
On Apr 2, 2021, 1:42 PM -0600, Don Mashak , wrote:
Thank you so much, Charley, this is going to take some time to digest.
Wow...
Do you have some same verbiage formerly declaring o the Court
"I am a State National, free citizen" and invoking the National
Constitution (Articles of Confederation)
Would also love to see an example of an order you gave a judge and forced
them to obey.
Please let me know when you find the Judicial "Code" to force Judges to
honor their oath.
The circa 1913 4th Branch, Administrative State was an act of war and is
unconstitutional for other reasons.
It violates the right to a jury trial, Separation of powers, and WE THE
PEOPLE as the sovereigns
The Progressive Globalist elites assert the masses are too stupid to
govern themselves (Page 52, "Illiberal Reformers"
2016, written by Progressive Professor Thomas Leonard, quoting the
founders of Progressivism)
This Administrative State was inserted between WE THE PEOPLE and the first
3 branches of government
to make the government less accountable to the allegedly ignorant masses.
(Pages 40-52) Null and Void per Marbury vs Madison.
The Administrative State combines the separated Executive, Legislative,
and Judicial Powers of Government
into one 4th branch. Progressives discarded the Constitution's separation
of powers (Page 66). And Provides
for their bastard child Administrative Courts with Administrative Judges
without access to Jury Trials)
Null and Void per Marbury vs Madison.
The Administrative State is an instrument of War and Revolution.
Progressive Globalist Elites borrowed from their sister "Social Darwinist"
organization, the UK Fabian Socialists, their strategy for nontraditional
revolution. This unconventional method of revolution calls for slow,
covert revolution over generations,
so no one generation notices enough change to revolt, resist or mount a
counter-revolution.
Null and Void perMarbury vs Madison.
After 100+ years, Progressive Elites have replaced leaders in Congress,
the Judiciary, Government attorneys, other bureaucracies, and major
Political Parties, with Progressive Globalist Loyalists. And in the last 20
years, they have
replaced the commanders of our Military and Law Enforcement with
Progressive Globalist Loyalists.
As acts to overthrow our US Constitution are repugnant to the Constitution
and constitute Treason, Insurrection, and Sedition. The entire bulwark of
Administrative State Laws and Rules are Null and Void per Marbury vs
Madison.
I want to invoke these newly learned jurisprudence principles to force the
dissolution of the entire Progressive
4th Branch, Administrative State.
Those were my thoughts.
Thank you for your time.
In Liberty,
Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
On Tuesday, March 30, 2021, 12:00:05 AM CDT, Charley Dan <
charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Cynical patriot
Two cents worth. Someone asked about article 1817 refers to article 1,
section,8, clause 17 that provides the definition for jurisdict. Or an
enumerated right.
Posit this: All these Lawyers and Judges (are supposed to) take an oath
and defend the Constitution
from all enemies, foreign and domestic..
How do these unconstitutional activities go on if Judges uphold their oath
of office?
*They do not uphold their oath till one calls them on it. In their code
and I need to find it that once one claims the national constitution
(articles of confederation) they are to immediately honor it. Most will do
some ridiculous thing in writing you but are totally not liable.*
And what exactly is a Judge or Lawyer obligated to do to support and
defend the Constitution?
*When one claims a state national, free citizen the judge is obligated to
honor orders you direct they do. Like I said, they will try a couple of
letters to see if you really know that the constitution is the law we the
people created for them in our sovereignty and common law.*
Should any claim involving the Clearfield doctrine immediately cease as
null and void because
per Marbury vs Madison, It is repugnant to the Constitution?
*The problem there is the Clearfield doctrine which allows us to sue them
and further raining is that the goverment is not constitutional.
Congressional record March 1993 vol. 33*
Fyi, I am trying to figure a way to combine this doctrine in litigation to
redress Election Fraud 2030,
*Voting is a public, group affair that legislating makes the rules. So one
can not use individual free citizen in the corporate world. *
the Progressive Globalist Insurrection that began circa 1913 with the
creation of the 4th Branch of Government, aka Administrative State (Pages
40-52, "Illiberal Reformers" (2016) by Progressive Professor, Thomas
Leonard) and nullifying a mortgage (along the lines of Credit River
Decision, Contract void because No
Consideration by bank. A Jury trial where the bank admitted on the record
that they created money out of thin air)
*mortgages have a serious problem when one claims free citizen. In common
law they must produce the agreement and did you authorize then to sell your
agreement. Many times when they sell it they charge you more. Little
research would blow the majority of mortgages today out of the water. *
A lawyer once told me court cases are like Tinkertoy projects, you have to
have the right pieces to complete the project.
*That is true but even if you have the right court cases the
administrator/judge is colluding with one party already*.
*My approach mainly so far has been kept simply to this. I motion/order
the court to obey the Supreme law (The constitution of the United States of
America.) *
*I motion that this or that be returned tI'll a trial by jury be held
according to the fifth amendment. If they want a jury? Well the
constitution states they lost their nationality by oath. They are claiming
harm by codes and that is null and void by supreme law. Case is shut on
opening statement. *
On Mar 29, 2021, 6:56 PM -0600,
administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, wrote:
Ok, so now I have read it and I grasp the rudimentary implications.
Posit this: All these Lawyers and Judges (are supposed to) take an oath
and defend the Constitution
from all enemies, foreign and domestic..
How do these unconstitutional activities go on if Judges uphold their oath
of office?
And what exactly is a Judge or Lawyer obligated to do to support and
defend the Constitution?
Should any claim involving the Clearfield doctrine immediately cease as
null and void because
per Marbury vs Madison, It is repugnant to the Constitution?
Fyi, I am trying to figure a way to combine this doctrine in litigation to
redress Election Fraud 2030,
the Progressive Globalist Insurrection that began circa 1913 with the
creation of the 4th Branch of Government, aka Administrative State (Pages
40-52, "Illiberal Reformers" (2016) by Progressive Professor, Thomas
Leonard) and nullifying a mortgage (along the lines of Credit River
Decision, Contract void because No
Consideration by bank. A Jury trial where the bank admitted on the record
that they created money out of thin air)
A lawyer once told me court cases are like Tinkertoy projects, you have to
have the right pieces to complete the project.
Thanks in advance for any feedback.
