The Northwest Ordinance came about because the Definitive Treaty of Peace of
1783 granted a huge tract of land to the federal government.
The Northwest Ordinance provides that common law is still available in federal
territory, and while it technically ONLY applies to the territory granted by
the Definitive Treaty of Peace of 1783, it actually applies in any Territory of
the United States, which means everywhere because they are using territorialism
with their US citizen slave status in all of the states.
There are some very powerful statements in the Northwest Ordinance for example
Article II says
The inhabitants of the said territory shall always be entitled to the benefits
of the writ of habeas corpus, and of the trial by jury; of a proportionate
representation of the people in the legislature; and of judicial proceedings
according to the course of the common law. All persons shall be bailable,
unless for capital offenses, where the proof shall be evident or the
presumption great. All fines shall be moderate; and no cruel or unusual
punishments shall be inflicted. No man shall be deprived of his liberty or
property, but by the judgment of his peers or the law of the land; and, should
the public exigencies make it necessary, for the common preservation, to take
any person's property, or to demand his particular services, full compensation
shall be made for the same. And, in the just preservation of rights and
property, it is understood and declared, that no law ought ever to be made, or
have force in the said territory, that shall, in any manner whatever, interfere
with or affect private contracts or engagements, bona fide, and without fraud,
previously formed.
Best Regards, Glenn
On Saturday, April 3, 2021, 01:31:04 PM CDT, Rick Miller
<ricky520057@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Charley, where does the Northwest Ordinance apply? Does it apply in all the
fifty republics or just those in the actual territory described in the
Ordinance? I live in the Southwest not the Northwest. Is this Ordinance still
applicable to me and can I refer to it when demanding to be treated as a man
and not property?
On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 7:36 PM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Don Mashak
Who are you? First one must cleanse their mind. Organic law is: Declaration of
Independence, Articles of Confederation and Northwest Ordinance and The
Constitution of the United States. As a free will individual and one created
the constution. They did not surrender these documents by the constitution.
They created two laws. Article 6 section 1 & 2. That article recognizes your
relationship with those documents. Article 1, section 8, clause 17 states your
not United States property or citizen. Unless they own you. They do not own me.
So who am I? I'm a free person who over threw the Britain reign. I'm one who
created the other organic law documents. Or my forefathers did.
That is why article 6;1&2 is important because it states there is two laws. One
is here and one was previous to this contract. Some here state two nations or
two constitutions and true. Article 1;8;17 shows the limitation of the United
States and I'm not their slave. That is ones hardest battle to prove.
Jurisdicton. Once done you have jurisdicton, authority, right to create orders.
The judge is your servant and administrator. Any use of codes and court cases
allows the judge to bring into your case all sorts of their codes. The reason I
do not read most posts here because I know you have a high chance of losing.
The only reason to use codes is because you do not know who you are. Northwest
Ordinance Section 14 article 2 states the law in that jurisdiction in few
sentences. Use Avalon project for original documents on this matter.
So I never looked for a code because that is United States codes and statues
and I do not need that to know who I am. If you do your an infant and need
their assistance/code. The Con artists love you to think liberty can be found
in there legislation. On Apr 2, 2021, 1:42 PM -0600, Don Mashak , wrote:
Thank you so much, Charley, this is going to take some time to digest. Wow...Do
you have some same verbiage formerly declaring o the Court
"I am a State National, free citizen" and invoking the National Constitution
(Articles of Confederation)Would also love to see an example of an order you
gave a judge and forced them to obey.
Please let me know when you find the Judicial "Code" to force Judges to honor
their oath.
The circa 1913 4th Branch, Administrative State was an act of war and is
unconstitutional for other reasons.It violates the right to a jury trial,
Separation of powers, and WE THE PEOPLE as the sovereigns
The Progressive Globalist elites assert the masses are too stupid to govern
themselves (Page 52, "Illiberal Reformers"2016, written by Progressive
Professor Thomas Leonard, quoting the founders of Progressivism)
This Administrative State was inserted between WE THE PEOPLE and the first 3
branches of governmentto make the government less accountable to the allegedly
ignorant masses. (Pages 40-52) Null and Void per Marbury vs Madison.
The Administrative State combines the separated Executive, Legislative, and
Judicial Powers of Governmentinto one 4th branch. Progressives discarded the
Constitution's separation of powers (Page 66). And Providesfor their bastard
child Administrative Courts with Administrative Judges without access to Jury
Trials)
Null and Void per Marbury vs Madison.
The Administrative State is an instrument of War and Revolution. Progressive
Globalist Elites borrowed from their sister "Social Darwinist" organization,
the UK Fabian Socialists, their strategy for nontraditionalrevolution. This
unconventional method of revolution calls for slow, covert revolution over
generations,so no one generation notices enough change to revolt, resist or
mount a counter-revolution.
Null and Void perMarbury vs Madison.
After 100+ years, Progressive Elites have replaced leaders in Congress, the
Judiciary, Government attorneys, other bureaucracies, and major Political
Parties, with Progressive Globalist Loyalists. And in the last 20 years, they
havereplaced the commanders of our Military and Law Enforcement with
Progressive Globalist Loyalists.As acts to overthrow our US Constitution are
repugnant to the Constitution and constitute Treason, Insurrection, and
Sedition. The entire bulwark of Administrative State Laws and Rules are Null
and Void per Marbury vs Madison.
I want to invoke these newly learned jurisprudence principles to force the
dissolution of the entire Progressive4th Branch, Administrative State.
Those were my thoughts.
Thank you for your time.
In Liberty,
Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
On Tuesday, March 30, 2021, 12:00:05 AM CDT, Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Cynical patriot
Two cents worth. Someone asked about article 1817 refers to article 1,
section,8, clause 17 that provides the definition for jurisdict. Or an
enumerated right.
Posit this: All these Lawyers and Judges (are supposed to) take an oath and
defend the Constitution
from all enemies, foreign and domestic..
How do these unconstitutional activities go on if Judges uphold their oath of
office?
They do not uphold their oath till one calls them on it. In their code and I
need to find it that once one claims the national constitution (articles of
confederation) they are to immediately honor it. Most will do some ridiculous
thing in writing you but are totally not liable.
And what exactly is a Judge or Lawyer obligated to do to support and defend the
Constitution?
When one claims a state national, free citizen the judge is obligated to honor
orders you direct they do. Like I said, they will try a couple of letters to
see if you really know that the constitution is the law we the people created
for them in our sovereignty and common law.
Should any claim involving the Clearfield doctrine immediately cease as null
and void because
per Marbury vs Madison, It is repugnant to the Constitution?
The problem there is the Clearfield doctrine which allows us to sue them and
further raining is that the goverment is not constitutional. Congressional
record March 1993 vol. 33
Fyi, I am trying to figure a way to combine this doctrine in litigation to
redress Election Fraud 2030,
Voting is a public, group affair that legislating makes the rules. So one can
not use individual free citizen in the corporate world.
the Progressive Globalist Insurrection that began circa 1913 with the creation
of the 4th Branch of Government, aka Administrative State (Pages 40-52,
"Illiberal Reformers" (2016) by Progressive Professor, Thomas Leonard) and
nullifying a mortgage (along the lines of Credit River Decision, Contract void
because No
Consideration by bank. A Jury trial where the bank admitted on the record that
they created money out of thin air)
mortgages have a serious problem when one claims free citizen. In common law
they must produce the agreement and did you authorize then to sell your
agreement. Many times when they sell it they charge you more. Little research
would blow the majority of mortgages today out of the water.
A lawyer once told me court cases are like Tinkertoy projects, you have to have
the right pieces to complete the project.
That is true but even if you have the right court cases the administrator/judge
is colluding with one party already.
My approach mainly so far has been kept simply to this. I motion/order the
court to obey the Supreme law (The constitution of the United States of
America.)
I motion that this or that be returned tI'll a trial by jury be held according
to the fifth amendment. If they want a jury? Well the constitution states they
lost their nationality by oath. They are claiming harm by codes and that is
null and void by supreme law. Case is shut on opening statement.
On Mar 29, 2021, 6:56 PM -0600,
administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, wrote:
Ok, so now I have read it and I grasp the rudimentary implications.
Posit this: All these Lawyers and Judges (are supposed to) take an oath and
defend the Constitution
from all enemies, foreign and domestic..
How do these unconstitutional activities go on if Judges uphold their oath of
office?
And what exactly is a Judge or Lawyer obligated to do to support and defend the
Constitution?
Should any claim involving the Clearfield doctrine immediately cease as null
and void because
per Marbury vs Madison, It is repugnant to the Constitution?
Fyi, I am trying to figure a way to combine this doctrine in litigation to
redress Election Fraud 2030,
the Progressive Globalist Insurrection that began circa 1913 with the creation
of the 4th Branch of Government, aka Administrative State (Pages 40-52,
"Illiberal Reformers" (2016) by Progressive Professor, Thomas Leonard) and
nullifying a mortgage (along the lines of Credit River Decision, Contract void
because No
Consideration by bank. A Jury trial where the bank admitted on the record that
they created money out of thin air)
A lawyer once told me court cases are like Tinkertoy projects, you have to have
the right pieces to complete the project.
Thanks in advance for any feedback.
