Bullroar
It is a State alienating you from an inalienable right,
and then charging you money to get that right back.Wholly Unconstitutional.
Those were my thoughts.
Thank you for your time.
In Liberty,
Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
Rt 1 Box 231
Albertville MN 55301
The information contained in this electronic mail transmission is intended only
for the use of the person or entity named above and is privileged and
confidential. Any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication
other than to the person or entity named above is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender
by phone and by replying to this message and then delete the message and any
attachments from your system.
On Friday, February 26, 2021, 8:58:04 AM CST, Ray Greninger
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
A DL is not a contract. It is license to exercise a state granted privilege.
It is more properly called an agreement.
On Thursday, February 25, 2021, 4:58:08 PM MST, Charley Dan
<charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
J_B
It'll work because it's all about jurisdiction which can be challenged at any
time. Even after conviction. DL is not a contract because they are not in your
jurisdiction. Go get a DL and next time stopped. Give it to him. Take ticket
and do as I say. It's over. It's fraud by them assuming your jurisdiction an
enlienable right. On Feb 25, 2021, 4:34 PM -0700, J_B <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx>, wrote:
I get what you say below. So are you saying "Just make a copy, write this on
ticket or arched paper to send to clerk of that court.
"Article 1, section 8, clause 17; I am a state national and not a United States
Citizen." Then go your merry way. I've never had or heard a judge doing
anything. A judge once notified of your national position he has to grant your
court or lose his bond."
wouldn't work because "one" has shown the pig a license?
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Garrison Michael <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 4:06 PM
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: Traffic tickets won under
common court law instead?
To: administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
If you show them a Drivers License with your signature on it then you
"Contracted" to be a Surety for ALL Debts charged to your Corporate
Entity/Strawman's Account (SS# & License No.) since it's registered to operate
& use the Public Streets for profit. It's really hard to prove that the Picture
& Signature is NOT Yours since ONLY the man can have one, so, the "presumption"
that you are the man responsible to pay for the debt charge is great, and now
it's up to you to prove otherwise in front of one of their Administrative
Officers. "Good Luck" it possible, but with "You the man" providing the proof
they need to "PROVE" you obligated to "pay" it becomes really hard. There is a
way around it all but then it takes action pro-actively rather than
re-actively...
I hope that helps explain things somewhat....
"Garrison"
On Sunday, February 21, 2021, 02:09:09 PM CST, J_B <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
the ticket is printed out via thermal printer all caps.
On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 4:06 PM Garrison Michael <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
If you show them a Drivers License with your signature on it then you
"Contracted" to be a Surety for ALL Debts charged to your Corporate
Entity/Strawman's Account (SS# & License No.) since it's registered to operate
& use the Public Streets for profit. It's really hard to prove that the Picture
& Signature is NOT Yours since ONLY the man can have one, so, the "presumption"
that you are the man responsible to pay for the debt charge is great, and now
it's up to you to prove otherwise in front of one of their Administrative
Officers. "Good Luck" it possible, but with "You the man" providing the proof
they need to "PROVE" you obligated to "pay" it becomes really hard. There is a
way around it all but then it takes action pro-actively rather than
re-actively...
I hope that helps explain things somewhat....
"Garrison"
On Sunday, February 21, 2021, 02:09:09 PM CST, J_B <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
purchase of what? sorry a bit confused.
On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 2:45 PM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Personal view
Traffic ticket is a notice and demand. Notice of infraction and demand for x
amount.
The question is if they have the right jurisdiction or individual. Are you a
United States property/citizen or are you a state national. They assume you are
citizen and till clarified you are what they say you are. You must show them
the law/constitution that clarifies what an United Stares citizen/property
requirements are. Purchase is required. On Feb 21, 2021, 12:03 PM -0700, J_B
<tf4624@xxxxxxxxx>, wrote:
Traffic tickets won under common court law instead?
Or via the fact its a contract to do business and fought under the admiralty
flag kangaroo courts
since under the Constitution, there needs to be an injured party. There is
none in this case of a ticket/citation. anyone here fights a traffic ticket
under common law court or even with kangaroo court under the fact the ticket is
to do business with the Cooperation *your fake name. A ticket is a contract
even though some lawyers online say it's a summons. But everything on the
ticket is printed out via thermal printer all caps.
