As one attorney said, the plaintiff wins ninety percent of the time. So
file a counterclaim to become the plaintiff. Common law helps do that.
Their names are just a title of nobility describing where they rank in the
United States legal system of being more educated then others
As administrators they not only direct the proceedings but determine the
law that is in affect. Article 3 of the constitution grants then authority
over law and equity and most never get out of equity or legislative law to
control the court or the black robe to administrate ones court.
Now remember that most people file a claim with an attorney or referred to
go find one. The reason legislation is in the court. When establishing
one's common law court the judge will ask if you really want Pro se or an
attorney. They want to make sure you do not consent or miss your
opportunity to use the United States services that are so......
On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 1:36 PM ejartz <ejartz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So Charlie, why do they then pretend to be acting as magistrates, judgesLife in one word--LOVE
and Senior judges when all they are, are administrators? Is there some
logic in what they're doing, or is it all deceit?
One of my friends maintains that the black robes are administrators
administrating abandoned vessels in a salvage operation. The adminstrators
act as guardians over the abandoned vessel to enable them to fleece the
securities as part of the salvage.
You can go in as an administrator (frcp 17) as a real party in interest
and can sue in your own name without joining the person for whose benefit
the action is brought (the legal person) and since state actors have
probably harmed you by detaining kidnapping unlawful confinement
confiscation of property, etc you have standing because you have an injury
in fact so you're all set with capacity, interest and standing to be in
court as a man not joining the person they are charging. So you can go in
and press a claim, which is what a man would do in an article III Court.
Alternatively, it's better to get the hell out of their courts and do a
removal to a federal article 3 Court under diversity impress a claim in the
federal court. That way you get out of there corrupt criminal Enterprise.
On Mon, Feb 21, 2022, 2:21 PM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I thought that is all the do is administered the court for the plaintiff--
On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 12:13 ejartz <ejartz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Bill,Life in one word--LOVE
I saw a case citation recently where the judges indicated that there are
no judges, only administrators of the courts. I can't remember where I saw
it and I was hoping you might have a reference to this or something similar.
Ed
On Mon, Feb 21, 2022, 12:32 PM Bill <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Mikee, I wiil send you my entire case from start to finish, if you
would like to use the administrative process. Bill.
billdealsre@xxxxxxxxx
On Monday, February 21, 2022, 10:51:39 AM CST, Mikee Siano <
dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Glen,
Since it is an equitable proceeding it wouldn’t make sense that I have
written in my motion that they are an administrative court enacted by the
legislature for commercial proposes Only and demand the plaintiff prove
that the proceeding is a judicial court ? I don’t mean to have you hold my
hand I’m just worried what I’m saying doesn’t make any sense
-thanks
Mikee
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 21, 2022, at 3:38 AM, Don Mashak (donmashak) <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<WCBPOU19FEB2022.jpg>
--
