[administrating-your-public-servants] Re: Fraud on the Court?

  • From: "Rick Paris" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "rickparis23" for DMARC)
  • To: administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 18:55:33 -0700

I personally would love that. I am enjoying so much trying to decipher 
everything. I want our Republic back and will support anything that assists in 
that process, the people will wake up. I enjoy the processes of hoping. :)

On Jun 24, 2021, at 4:31 AM, NELSON DICE <nelsondice@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

Would anyone in the group see value and be interested in starting and 
creating a modifiable checklist of key phrases and content that must be 
included in certain court doc responses that the group concensus can weigh in 
on? 

This could help my study and comprehension.

No rush.....


😊
From: administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
<administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of J_B 
<tf4624@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2021 8:22 PM
To: administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
<administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: Fraud on the Court?
 
your opening is forgetting " I do not understand, no do I stand under 
these"....

On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 8:02 PM Nikole Fortier <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
<mailto:dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
I realize this is a commercial contract, but it's a template I worked from 
and modified today to offer a special appearance to the Court after rejecting 
the attorney's offer to contract for a hearing I've been ordered to. 

Use if it's of benefit to you/any/all. 

LOVE,
nikole 



On Wednesday, June 23, 2021, 03:28:21 PM PDT, Fred Wind 
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:


you have to overstand the verbiage they use, and the content put into 
context, when a term or word of art such as 'shall' directed toward a public 
agent, the term or word of art has the meaning of 'MUST' as it is a command 
to perform such duty, when the term or word of art 'shall' is directed toward 
a private 'person', then it takes on the meaning of 'MAY', not required to 
act according to statute

Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android 
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgo.onelink.me%2F107872968%3Fpid%3DInProduct%26c%3DGlobal_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers%26af_wl%3Dym%26af_sub1%3DInternal%26af_sub2%3DGlobal_YGrowth%26af_sub3%3DEmailSignature&data=04%7C01%7C%7C0f679b53e8e74f8d63a408d936a63cee%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637600909876096730%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=ptlblxWeGJUzy0m4hIAxmV4kM5go1oGIpo1nPqrYY1c%3D&reserved=0>
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 6:01 PM, J_B
<tf4624@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:tf4624@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
you ye folks for the state of Texas... or for them STATE OF TEXAS  Bar 
Greviences attached

On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 4:29 PM Seeker <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
<mailto:dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Please include me also Glenn
Seeker 


On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 3:05 PM, clarence rankins 
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

When or if you do the bar attorney template, please let me in on that.  

Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android 
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgo.onelink.me%2F107872968%3Fpid%3DInProduct%26c%3DGlobal_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers%26af_wl%3Dym%26af_sub1%3DInternal%26af_sub2%3DGlobal_YGrowth%26af_sub3%3DEmailSignature&data=04%7C01%7C%7C0f679b53e8e74f8d63a408d936a63cee%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637600909876096730%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=ptlblxWeGJUzy0m4hIAxmV4kM5go1oGIpo1nPqrYY1c%3D&reserved=0>
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 11:57 AM, Shining Emperor
<nrcwinner@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:nrcwinner@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Glenn:

Bar grievance needs to be very powerful to get attentions since it is their  
private guild club.

Would you be kindly give a juicrd-up template or sample for us all to add 
our specifics?

It would really help lots of people flooding BAR with grievance to State 
BAR, ABA, UN to cause international heat?

On Tue, Jun 22, 2021, 14:41 Me <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
<mailto:dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
I would do Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 first and then the same day start 
working on the BAR grievances to be filed ASAP

Send them to me and I will help you juice them up.

Best Regards, Glenn


On Tuesday, June 22, 2021, 02:40:33 AM CDT, NELSON DICE <nelsondice@xxxxxxxx 
<mailto:nelsondice@xxxxxxxx>> wrote:


No, but I can and I will.

are BAR grievances first or is responding in their Court to ORDER to appear 
first in importance?
From: administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
<mailto:administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
<mailto:administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf 
of Me <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Monday, June 21, 2021 11:52 PM
To: administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
<mailto:administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
<mailto:administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: Fraud on the Court?
 
Did you file BAR grievances? against the liars?

Best Regards, Glenn


On Monday, June 21, 2021, 04:59:34 PM CDT, NELSON DICE <nelsondice@xxxxxxxx 
<mailto:nelsondice@xxxxxxxx>> wrote:


Anyone care to offer their opinion in what they would do regarding any 
response or filling regarding order to appear?  

Can a man just ignore their orders and make the sherriffs come and get me?

What is the worst that can happen other than death?
From: administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
<mailto:administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
<mailto:administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf 
of Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:charleydan@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Monday, June 21, 2021 2:48 PM
To: administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
<mailto:administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
<mailto:administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: Fraud on the Court?
 
It's there jurisdicton or authority. I pray in my jurisdiction that I can 
change according to my needs. 

On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 12:46 PM Jb <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx 
<mailto:tf4624@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
? Have you read court rules. All of them have a section where they can break 
them as they please 

On Jun 21, 2021, at 2:26 PM, Fred Wind (Redacted sender "elemental4wind" 
for DMARC) <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
<mailto:dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

Nelson, the way I see it, based on experience, THEY can choose to ignore 
their own rules, not just bend them but break them, the RULES are 
constructed in an arbitrary manner that can be interpreted to suit their 
needs, you really expect corrupt Satanists to abide by WORDS the wordsmiths 
( lie-yers)  conjured up?
statutes, ordinances, codes, RULES, are self executing knowledge filters 
for the common man\woman who must then use the local magician (attorney) to 
decode ( good luck) the spell for you

Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android 
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgo.onelink.me%2F107872968%3Fpid%3DInProduct%26c%3DGlobal_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers%26af_wl%3Dym%26af_sub1%3DInternal%26af_sub2%3DGlobal_YGrowth%26af_sub3%3DEmailSignature&data=04%7C01%7C%7C0f679b53e8e74f8d63a408d936a63cee%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637600909876106720%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=9C7ZFhLwUGeYYCrdyBz%2B6xb5vCSDDaGZCNUWO%2BmxKz0%3D&reserved=0>
On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 1:45 PM, NELSON DICE
<nelsondice@xxxxxxxx <mailto:nelsondice@xxxxxxxx>> wrote:
 
If Rule 1:37-1 states that the Municipal Court tile for the City of Ocean 
City shall be

 
“Municipal Court of Ocean City”

 
and all apparent paperwork for years has been

 
“OCEAN CITY MUNICIPAL COURT”,

 
Does this indicate fraud?

 
 
Hers is the NJCOURTS.gov webpage too

 
https://www.njcourts.gov/courts/directions/capemaymuncourts/oc.html ;
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.njcourts.gov%2Fcourts%2Fdirections%2Fcapemaymuncourts%2Foc.html&data=04%7C01%7C%7C0f679b53e8e74f8d63a408d936a63cee%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637600909876116715%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=ASyIBqafZDLdIuazixSwH0Pcdk7Nn9uJFuBVsMPh8bQ%3D&reserved=0>
 
-- 
Life in one word--LOVE



With Life, Liberty, and Happiness,

Rick Sousa
rickparis23@xxxxxxxxx



Other related posts: