Science will always be wrong, simply because it relies on consensus, and the
consensus is always wrong. The majority will always end up being wrong.
On May 23, 2021, at 10:49 AM, Michael Glavic (Redacted sender
"bydefinitionofunderstanding" for DMARC) <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
To a suggestion if not question that the government needs to get a firmer
hold on the situation if not the public:
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-alberta-sees-shift-in-covid-19-vaccine-hesitancy-resistance-as-rollout/#comments
<https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-alberta-sees-shift-in-covid-19-vaccine-hesitancy-resistance-as-rollout/#comments>
You must be kidding. Science has been proven wrong the majority of time (how
long technology takes to get things right, if not better) since its
inception, or the beginning of our, knowledgeable research, including primary
research, it being a work in progress, how little we really understand of
most things, but, with politics, it being surely not about justice
"primarily," (otherwise) whatever else might matter, depending on government
giving its head a shake... for what is better if not best in such respect.
I figure official science hasn't yet evolved, "So far," (on the data that
should matter, if not does, most, how compromised or corrupt science is,
otherwise) and behave accordingly, figuring, until government if not science
prioritizes "justice" and serving justice it's somewhat the enemy,
relatively/reasonably speaking. Your move
Best to be on top of things, (what I think of what we know, otherwise, and do
about it) the government having "much to answer for" (if not serve, as for
justice) in such regard, I'm, So sure, and on the case, of disordered if not
sick politics if not humanity, and whatever else, otherwise..
Or what, official BS by the official scribes? So not..
Michael Glavic
So dealing with the official scribes, etc.. .
Champion of as much
BWE
On Sunday, May 23, 2021, 12:28:34 a.m. EDT, Michael Glavic
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-alberta-sees-shift-in-covid-19-vaccine-hesitancy-resistance-as-rollout/#comments
<https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-alberta-sees-shift-in-covid-19-vaccine-hesitancy-resistance-as-rollout/#comments>
Not all bad. Waiting, or looking before you leap, has given people better
"information". Spinning it another way doesn't serve justice, (of the whole
truth) and what a government if not society needs to do to have any
credibility (if not a, "conscientious" respect, not of fear) is to establish
that it is about "justice" (fairness, as to honesty, open honesty) more than
anything else, health, etc., being an individual responsibility in such
respect. Twisting it around to serve an alternative purpose, as with
politics, does not help.
Government (if not the people they represent) needs to better prioritize
"justice" and serving justice (of the individual, of one and all) in such
respect, or, continue to have more trouble, in ways it may not even yet have
imagined or calculated, fear, of our leadership, if not of thinking not being
a worthy or truly helpful motivator, I'm So sure
Michael Glavic
Champion of as much
Dealing with the spin (if not worse) of politics and abuse, how I feel we all
should, that "justice" would be served, re., more people coming on board with
vaccinating, etc.. . On balancing if not dismissing other people's horse sht,
how best to do It? .. .
BWE
