The state does not determine when the law takes affect. In fact the
articles of confederation says all are welcome. Is the law partial? Not we
we are created equal with the inelienable rights to liberty and property
and life to exist.
On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 4:37 PM James M. Ramalho <jmr3749@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Where is the Secretary’s authority to change the status/allegiance of theLife in one word--LOVE
people of the states? See: 4 USC 72
.
This section contemplates two sources of citizenship, and two sources
only: birth and naturalization. The persons declared 102
<https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=15118083235858813035&q=Elk+v.+Wilkins+112+U.S.+94&hl=en&as_sdt=3,30#p102>
*102
<https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=15118083235858813035&q=Elk+v.+Wilkins+112+U.S.+94&hl=en&as_sdt=3,30#p102>
to
be citizens are "all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and
subject to the jurisdiction thereof." The evident meaning of these last
words are, not merely subject in some respect or degree to the jurisdiction
of the United States, but completely subject to their political
jurisdiction, and owing them direct and immediate allegiance. And the
words relate to the time of birth in the one case, as they do to the time
of naturalization in the other. Persons not thus subject to the
jurisdiction of the United States at the time of birth cannot become so
afterwards, except by being naturalized, either individually, as by
proceedings under the naturalization acts, or collectively, as by the force
of a treaty by which foreign territory is acquired.
8USC § 1481.
Loss of nationality by native-born or naturalized citizen; voluntary
action; burden of proof; presumptions
(a)A person who is a national of the United States whether by birth or
naturalization, shall lose his nationality by voluntarily performing any
of the following acts with the intention of relinquishing United States
nationality—
(1) obtaining naturalization in a foreign state upon his own application
or upon an application filed by a duly authorized agent, after having
attained the age of eighteen years; or
(2) taking an oath or making an affirmation or other formal declaration of
allegiance to a foreign state or a political subdivision thereof, after
having attained the age of eighteen years;
Congress had to give the people in that states a remedy against the
Fourteenth Amendment or they could be hung for treason.
The United States Supreme Court expressly held that Congress may not
establish a “trade or business” (citizen of the United States), and by
implication a “public office” (citizen of the United States), in a state of
the Union and tax it.
“Congress cannot authorize a “*trade or business” (citizen of the United
States) *within a state in order to tax it.
License Tax Cases, 72 U.S. 462, 18 L. Ed. 497, 5 Wall. 462, 2 A.F.T.R.
2224 (1866)
That was our responsibility when *Escobedo* was before us and it is our
491
<https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=6386252699535531764&q=miranda+v+arizona+brief&hl=en&as_sdt=3,30#p491>
*491
<https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=6386252699535531764&q=miranda+v+arizona+brief&hl=en&as_sdt=3,30#p491>
responsibility today.
“Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no
rule making or legislation which would abrogate them.” Supreme Court of
United States Miranda v. Arizona 384 U.S. 436 (1966)
*From:* administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <
administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> *On Behalf Of *
J_B
*Sent:* Wednesday, September 1, 2021 4:36 PM
*To:* administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: Articles of
Confederation video
charly i think you might be mixed up. Fixing ones status the normal way
with the SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE UNITED STATES
<https://www.google.com/maps/search/THE+UNITED+STATES+2201+C+Street+NW.+Washington,+District+of+Columbia+20520?entry=gmail&source=g>
2201 C Street NW. Washington, District of Columbia 20520
<https://www.google.com/maps/search/THE+UNITED+STATES+2201+C+Street+NW.+Washington,+District+of+Columbia+20520?entry=gmail&source=g>
doesnt not surrender 100 percent your citizen to the USA.. Thats actually
a different form.
On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 2:25 PM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Nelson and every one. That perpetual union is alive today. The Articles of
confederation is alive. If one contacts an immigration attorney familar
with non-citizen national certificate they will here that you cannot vote
in the feral election but you vote in another election. The Articles of
confederation election. Another reason I do not want to surrender
completely my status as an United States Citizen. I want to surrender just
when I do not want to participate in the non-sense.
On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 11:27 AM NELSON DICE <nelsondice@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
https://youtu.be/GXDmxSZVBmQ
--
Life in one word--LOVE
--