[adaptivetec] Re: Accessing the AT&T Websites

  • From: GEAN <wren771@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "adaptivetec@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <adaptivetec@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 13:23:51 -0700

Lori:

Do you have windows 7? If so then maybe Windows live may be an option. AT&T 
suck when it comes to disability issue, especially persons who are blind & 
visually impaired. It's so annoying & frustrating. 

I hope Steve or SILVANA can assist you. Sorry. 



> On Oct 29, 2014, at 12:06 PM, Megan <mwinfield83@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Lori,
> 
> Have you tried calling thee NCCD through Att about your problem?
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Oct 29, 2014, at 10:46 AM, Mike and Lori Castner 
>> <mandlcastner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> I'm wondering if any of you use the AT&T website to check your email and if
>> so if
>> you have any suggestions for marking the check boxes.
>> 
>> About a year ago, ATT "improved" their email and it became very difficult
>> to move
>> spam email, which is often incorrectly marked as spam, from my spam folder
>> on the
>> server. It was no longer possible to simply space on a check box for an
>> email I wanted
>> to select. Scott Blanks found a link to a mobile site which still permitted
>> checking
>> the check boxes by spacing.
>> 
>> However, now that simple site has been "improved" and I have to go through a
>> three-or-four
>> step process to select an email and remove the spam marking.
>> I spoke with at&t today with no success. I can't figure out how to turn off
>> "spam
>> blocker" on the site, and my discussion with at&t is not worth expanding on.
>> But
>> if anyone knows of a simple site for at&t or a way to easily check the check
>> boxes
>> I would appreciate it.
>> 
>> By the way, I spoke with AT&T about a year ago regarding the problems with
>> their
>> accessibility; I was told that they knew the site did not work well for
>> blind people
>> and fixing it was not a priority. I mentioned the issue again today and said
>> they
>> had better get their priorities straight.
>> Lori C.
> 

Other related posts: