Thanks James (and also to George) for the clarification. I can see what is meant in Security terms, but initially I thought that it was being claimed that Vista and XP are effectibvely the same in all other respects. Having said that i have read of UAC being blamed for problems occurring in certain software instalations, and I wondered whether my problems with a Hal 10 demo were in that category. It now appears that a bad download of the installer was probably responsible. I have downloaded a new copy which is some 40 mb larger than the one I had been using, and hope to fare better when I try it later. Douglas On 21 Dec 2008 at 11:48, James Scholes wrote: > Hi Douglas, Chris is speaking metaforically here. He's saying that UAC is > the only feature worth having in Vista, and if you disable it then your > technically running XP in security terms. > > On Sunday, December 21, 2008 at 11:09 AM (GMT), Douglas Harrison wrote: > Sorry Chris, but I am not with you here! Admittedly one feature of Vista > had apparently been disabled without my knowledge, but I believe that > everything else is running as it should in Vista. If you think that I am > wrong, please clarify. > > > Douglas > -- Douglas Harrison ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe] ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to: ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** and in the Subject line type ** unsubscribe ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the ** immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq] ** or send a message, to ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq