Without Altitude we wouldn't have destroyed 10 Me 262's.
Witch
On 1 November 2019 at 22:27, 56RAF_phoenix <phoenix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
However, I largely agree about altitude. It's always tempting to go for
a strike mission at cloud base on visibility grounds. In reality, it
better to be higher unless the clouds are more continuous.
Diving in on target from ~8000 ft and exiting on the same heading is
pretty hard to beat. As we found today.
56RAF_phoenix
On 01/11/2019 22:24, 56RAF_phoenix wrote:
Yes, we saw you IDed you and realised who you might be.
We had no problem getting to and hitting the target. The problem came
later close to home.
56RAF_phoenix
On 01/11/2019 11:04, Colin (Redacted sender bart_56 for DMARC) wrote:
As we got close below their six, we noticed that they were two
Tempest carrying bombs lumbering around at 3000ft, we both sighed
flew below them and headed to the east. Again if they saw us they did
not show it or that they saw it was two Tempest coming in behind them
and where not bothered. If we were 109’s they would have been dead,
why because they were flying low even if they had seen us. On both
cases even though the formations attacked should have seen us, it
proves that you can fly these mutually supporting formations, but if
you don’t use it properly it’s not worth flying them.
Our day finished on a bad note as we got shot down low, separated,
low on fuel, and altitude beat us to hammer the point home lol.
Colin
Sent from my iPad
