I was just looking for feedback on the way I'd summed up Wittgenstein's significance for a number of non-philosophical types with whom I am acquainted. So few outside of philosophy seem to know of his work, despite its profound influence, that I am often moved to try to tip them off as to why he matters. -- SWM --- In Wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Sean Wilson <whoooo26505@...> wrote: > > (Stuart) > > ... actualy, we can do that, Stuart, if you want. But my concern is that we > had aleady done so. And after the sharing, I'm not sure what else there is to > do. There have been innumerable times when you have indicated a different > sort of orientation. So I was just wanting to avoid two people saying > something over and over again. > > If there is something specific you want to discuss again, we could do it > again, if you wish. > > Regards and thanks. > > Dr. Sean Wilson, Esq. > Assistant Professor > Wright State University > Personal Website: http://seanwilson.org > SSRN papers: http://tinyurl.com/3eatnrx > Wittgenstein Discussion: http://seanwilson.org/wiki/doku.php?id=wittrs ; >