BruceD wrote: >Joseph Polanik wrote: >>no one denies that there are two vocabularies in use; and, except for >>a few eliminative materialists, no one is trying to change that fact. >Thank you for helping me with this stuff. Often I sounds more convinced >that I am. In an event, while I agree, "no one (here, to limited the >generalization) denies that there are two vocabularies", some (here), >by thinking of mind in a causal relation with brain, are in effect, >transforming the vocabulary of reason into one of causation. those are the two vocabularies. we experience ourselves as agents of purposeful activity; but, neuroscientists measuring the brain activity correlated with experiences of intentional actions have a separate vocabulary for describing brain activity. that's predicate dualism SEP: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/dualism/ Wikepedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dualism_(philosophy_of_mind) >I recognize that you have written at length about the application of >quantum theory to these matters. Could you Post a review that >highlights your position? I'll work on that. Joe -- Nothing Unreal is Self-Aware @^@~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~@^@ http://what-am-i.net @^@~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~@^@ ========================================== Need Something? Check here: http://ludwig.squarespace.com/wittrslinks/