[Wittrs] Re: Debating with Functional Programmers
- From: "iro3isdx" <xznwrjnk-evca@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: wittrsamr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 03:39:23 -0000
--- In Wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "kirby_urner" <wittrsamr@...> wrote:
> I'm not sure who Bishop is in this case -- one of those proper
> names in need of disambiguation.
Ah, sorry. I assumed you would know since you brought up
constructivism. But perhaps you were referring to the Math Education
kind of constructism. In any case, my comment was about Errett Bishop
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Errett_Bishop> .
> The FP vs OO debate is somewhat silly, as it presumes either/or. Of
> course we want our students to have the same overview we have. Yes,
> these different approaches exist. Who said we can't spend some
> energy looking at several approaches?
Yes, I agree.
Regards,
Neil
Other related posts:
